From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: error reading variable: value has been optimized out
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4q4zav8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5051D2A7.2000009@broadcom.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:33:43 +0100")
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com> writes:
Tom> If it is just a theoretical problem I think we can just declare it
Tom> unsupported; and, if we do see it, try reporting it as a compiler bug
Tom> first. After all, the compiler could just emit an empty piece instead.
Andrew> I'm happy to mark these tests as unsupported. As the tests (#2
Andrew> -> #4) are pretty much zero cost given that I'm adding test #1
Andrew> anyway I'd like to leave them in. I've created a new patch, the
Andrew> only change is that test #3 and #4 now report unsupported (with
Andrew> comment), and test #2 reports pass, with a comment to explain
Andrew> the reasoning.
Andrew> + # If we ever fix gdb so this passes we should delete the
Andrew> + # unsupported case below.
Andrew> + xpass $test
Andrew> + unsupported $test
I think these tests should 'pass' if they generate the correct output,
and 'kfail' otherwise.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-24 12:11 Andrew Burgess
2012-08-26 18:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-27 15:46 ` Tom Tromey
2012-08-31 9:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-31 10:33 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-01 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 8:32 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-03 11:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-03 15:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-03 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-04 16:58 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-05 18:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-12 17:30 ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-13 12:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-14 19:02 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-09-14 21:39 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-17 16:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-19 14:29 ` Andrew Burgess
2012-09-20 13:28 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-21 17:19 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4q4zav8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox