Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method

[Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>]

Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:

> Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:24:10AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>
>>> > +          if (SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (sym)[0] > name[0])
>>> > +            {
>>> > +              break;
>>> > +            }
>>> 
>>> If this test works, then wouldn't some sort of strcmp test work too?
>>
>> It is comparing unmangled names, so there may be space chars which
>> are not significant.  I don't know enough about mangling to be
>> confident that I could put a strcmp in here safely.
> You could if they were always mangled, but they aren't.
> The unmangled names need to be strcmp_iw'd.
>
> We use demangled names when doing symbol lookups because it is easier
> to demangle whatever you type in, and look that up, than it is to take
> what you type in, mangle it, and look that up.
>
> *Much* easier.
>
>> out later today and see if the testsuite happens to trip up on it.
>> The SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME() call used for the actual comparison uses
>> util.c:strcmp_iw, which skips over whitespace.
> Right.
>
>>
>> (On the good news side, when I first started working on this loop,
>> I found that using strcmp() to detect matches produced a number of
>> testsuite regressions, helping to Show Me The Light.)
>
> Your test above isn't quite correct, actually.
> There is a corner case of the first character being a space. I don't
> think this can ever occur in c or C++, no clue about other
> languages.
Oh, and in case it's not clear, the problem with the first char being
space is that in strcmp_iw, we'd ignore that.

>
>>
>> Jason
>
> -- 
> "One time the power went out in my house and I had to use the
> flash on my camera to see my way around.  I made a sandwich and
> took fifty pictures of my face.  The neighbors thought there was
> lightning in my house.
> "-Steven Wright

-- 
""-Steven Wright