From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jiwang@tilera.com (Jiong Wang)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] TILEGX Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure.
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tx6hcvb5.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201407151000.s6FA0qeJ008359@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:00:52 +0200 (CEST)")
On Tue, Jul 15 2014, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Andreas Arnez wrote:
>
>> gdb/
>> * tilegx-linux-tdep.c (tilegx_linux_supply_regset): Delete
>> function. Move logic to...
>> (tilegx_linux_regmap): ... this new register map.
>> (TILEGX_GREGS_SIZE): New enum value.
>> (tilegx_linux_regset): Refer to register map, replace supply
>> method by regcache_supply_regset, and add collect method.
>
>> +static const struct regcache_map_entry tilegx_linux_regmap[] =
>> + {
>> + { TILEGX_NUM_EASY_REGS, 0 },
>
> Maybe TILEGX_R0_REGNUM instead of 0?
Maybe. Or, thinking about this again, I'd more clearly indicate the
group of "easy" registers with a new enum value
TILEGX_FIRST_EASY_REGNUM = TILEGX_R0_REGNUM
OK?
>
>> + { 1, TILEGX_PC_REGNUM },
>
> This seems to get the register size wrong in 32-bit mode; note
> that TILEGX_PC_REGNUM has type builtin_func_ptr, which may be
> 4 bytes in size ...
Hm, I didn't realize that 32-bit mode is actually supported. Note that
tilegx_register_type() unconditionally assigns a 64-bit type to *all
other* registers:
if (regnum == TILEGX_PC_REGNUM)
return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
else
return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_uint64;
Also, the original logic in tilegx_linux_supply_regset() maps an 8-byte
slot to each register. In 32-bit mode, this behavior doesn't seem to
match the Linux kernel code, which -- if I interpret it correctly --
assigns the same type 'pt_reg_t' to all registers in pt_regs, and:
pt_reg_t == uint_reg_t == __uint_reg_t == unsigned long
Thus, each register should be in a 4-byte slot, and the register type
for everything but the PC should be builtin_uint32, right?
Has GDB ever been used for 32-bit TILE-Gx core files? Or am I getting
something wrong here?
>
>> + { 1, TILEGX_FAULTNUM_REGNUM },
>> + { 0 }
>> + };
>>
>> - if (regnum == gri || regnum == -1)
>> - regcache_raw_supply (regcache, gri, ptr);
>> - }
>> -}
>> +enum
>> +{
>> + TILEGX_GREGS_SIZE = (TILEGX_NUM_EASY_REGS + 2) * tilegx_reg_size
>> +};
>
> This doesn't appear to be used here.
Removed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 16:49 [PATCH v2 00/13] Regset rework preparations part 2 Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] TILEGX Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 10:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-16 13:30 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] M68K Linux: Define regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 12:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-16 18:01 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] IA64 " Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 13:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-18 9:06 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] FRV Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in " Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] Rename 'descr' field in regset structure to 'regmap' Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] HPPA Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] NIOS2 Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] ALPHA Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] M32R Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] SCORE: " Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 10:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-15 12:25 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] S390: Migrate to regcache_supply/collect_regset Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 9:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-15 12:07 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] regcache: Add functions suitable for regset_supply/collect Andreas Arnez
2014-07-07 9:32 ` Omair Javaid
2014-07-08 11:32 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-07-08 19:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-07-10 7:54 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-07-19 13:10 ` Omair Javaid
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] AARCH64 Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-07-07 9:57 ` Omair Javaid
2014-07-01 8:00 ` [ping][PATCH v2 00/13] Regset rework preparations part 2 Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tx6hcvb5.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jiwang@tilera.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox