From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Omair Javaid <omair.javaid@linaro.org>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] regcache: Add functions suitable for regset_supply/collect.
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 11:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhs4f5ng.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANW4E-0cEaQ=DLN5SVjWtCiHCK5iDDqUFnEgKbACig+pe4pW_A@mail.gmail.com> (Omair Javaid's message of "Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:32:21 +0500")
On Mon, Jul 07 2014, Omair Javaid wrote:
> Is there a way around avoiding the loop in supply/collect where regnum
> != -1? It should be more efficient in cases where we are looking for a
> register with regnum > 0.
Good question. The most straightforward way would be a register map
format where regnum is used as an index into an array of offsets, like
this:
int s390_regmap_gregset[S390_NUM_REGS] =
{
/* Program Status Word. */
0x00, 0x04,
/* General Purpose Registers. */
0x08, 0x0c, 0x10, 0x14,
0x18, 0x1c, 0x20, 0x24,
0x28, 0x2c, 0x30, 0x34,
0x38, 0x3c, 0x40, 0x44,
/* Access Registers. */
0x48, 0x4c, 0x50, 0x54,
0x58, 0x5c, 0x60, 0x64,
0x68, 0x6c, 0x70, 0x74,
0x78, 0x7c, 0x80, 0x84,
/* Floating Point Control Word. */
-1,
/* Floating Point Registers. */
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
/* GPR Uppper Halves. */
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,
/* GNU/Linux-specific optional "registers". */
0x88, -1, -1,
};
This is a real example. For the full example refer to:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/s390-tdep.c;h=72d55450225e89da4394079efac1fa33b36cb68c;hb=d91fab15e7eb04f6c9b7fee5859d8815b7aa84ee#l412
As you see, this is where the s390 implementation came from. Then I
realized that regnum > 0 is a very rare case, and that the common case
was suboptimal with this format, because the supply/collect functions
had to iterate over *all* registers, not just those of a specific
regset.
Patch #3 in this series expresses the regmap from above like this:
static const struct regcache_map_entry s390_gregmap[] =
{
{ 1, S390_PSWM_REGNUM },
{ 1, S390_PSWA_REGNUM },
{ 16, S390_R0_REGNUM },
{ 16, S390_A0_REGNUM },
{ 1, S390_ORIG_R2_REGNUM },
{ 0 }
};
In addition to being more efficient in the common case, I also consider
this version much easier to read and maintain.
We could certainly spend more effort on supplying and collecting a
single register more efficiently. For instance, we could offer
additional routines for that special case, perhaps in conjunction with a
preparation function that converts a regmap to an indexed-by-regnum
array. However, I wouldn't focus on that too much before actually
making use of it. Note that currently these functions are *always*
called with regnum == -1.
In fact, it may be more adequate to completely get rid of the parameter
regnum in the regset supply/collect functions. Any reason why we
shouldn't?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-25 16:49 [PATCH v2 00/13] Regset rework preparations part 2 Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] ALPHA Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] M32R Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] SCORE: " Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 10:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-15 12:25 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] S390: Migrate to regcache_supply/collect_regset Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 9:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-15 12:07 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] regcache: Add functions suitable for regset_supply/collect Andreas Arnez
2014-07-07 9:32 ` Omair Javaid
2014-07-08 11:32 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2014-07-08 19:09 ` Omair Javaid
2014-07-10 7:54 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-07-19 13:10 ` Omair Javaid
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] AARCH64 Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-07-07 9:57 ` Omair Javaid
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] HPPA " Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] NIOS2 Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] IA64 Linux: Define regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 13:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-18 9:06 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] FRV Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in " Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] Rename 'descr' field in regset structure to 'regmap' Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] TILEGX Linux: Fill 'collect_regset' in regset structure Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 10:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-16 13:30 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-06-25 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] M68K Linux: Define regset structures Andreas Arnez
2014-07-15 12:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-07-16 18:01 ` Andreas Arnez
2014-07-01 8:00 ` [ping][PATCH v2 00/13] Regset rework preparations part 2 Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lhs4f5ng.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox