* [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows
[not found] <20260508144232.940078-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
@ 2026-05-08 14:42 ` Hannes Domani
2026-05-08 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2026-05-08 19:09 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Domani @ 2026-05-08 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
GCC 16 introduced native TLS variables on Windows, so this adds
debugger support for them.
I've used the fetch_tls_load_module_address gdbarch method to get the
address of _tls_index of the OBJFILE, which is then forwarded as LM_ADDR
to windows_get_thread_local_address, but I'm not really sure if this is
allowed.
---
gdb/windows-tdep.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/windows-tdep.c b/gdb/windows-tdep.c
index 38ee1d7275e..0ff8c5f580a 100644
--- a/gdb/windows-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/windows-tdep.c
@@ -954,6 +954,58 @@ windows_init_abi_common (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
set_gdbarch_get_siginfo_type (gdbarch, windows_get_siginfo_type);
}
+/* Get the address of variable "_tls_index" of OBJFILE. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+windows_tls_index_address (struct objfile *objfile)
+{
+ bound_minimal_symbol minsym
+ = lookup_minimal_symbol_linkage("_tls_index", objfile, false);
+ if (minsym.minsym == nullptr)
+ throw_error (TLS_GENERIC_ERROR, _("Cannot find address of _tls_index"));
+
+ return minsym.value_address ();
+}
+
+/* Implement the get_thread_local_address gdbarch method. */
+
+static CORE_ADDR
+windows_get_thread_local_address (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, ptid_t ptid,
+ CORE_ADDR lm_addr, CORE_ADDR offset)
+{
+ int ptr_bytes;
+ int tls_offset;
+ if (gdbarch_ptr_bit (gdbarch) == 32)
+ {
+ ptr_bytes = 4;
+ tls_offset = 44;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ ptr_bytes = 8;
+ tls_offset = 88;
+ }
+
+ gdb_byte buf[8];
+ if (target_read_memory (lm_addr, buf, 4))
+ throw_error (TLS_GENERIC_ERROR, _("Cannot read _tls_index"));
+
+ enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch);
+ uint32_t tls_index = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 4, byte_order);
+ CORE_ADDR tlb, tls_ptr, slot_ptr;
+ if (target_get_tib_address (ptid, &tlb)
+ && !target_read_memory (tlb + tls_offset, buf, ptr_bytes)
+ && (tls_ptr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, ptr_bytes,
+ byte_order)) != 0
+ && !target_read_memory (tls_ptr + tls_index * ptr_bytes,
+ buf, ptr_bytes)
+ && (slot_ptr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, ptr_bytes,
+ byte_order)) != 0)
+ return slot_ptr + offset;
+
+ throw_error (TLS_NOT_ALLOCATED_YET_ERROR, _("TLS not allocated yet"));
+}
+
/* See windows-tdep.h. */
void
windows_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
@@ -963,6 +1015,12 @@ windows_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
/* On Windows, "long"s are only 32bit. */
set_gdbarch_long_bit (gdbarch, 32);
+
+ /* Enable TLS support. */
+ set_gdbarch_fetch_tls_load_module_address (gdbarch,
+ windows_tls_index_address);
+ set_gdbarch_get_thread_local_address (gdbarch,
+ windows_get_thread_local_address);
}
/* See windows-tdep.h. */
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows
2026-05-08 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows Hannes Domani
@ 2026-05-08 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2026-05-08 19:09 ` Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2026-05-08 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Domani; +Cc: gdb-patches
> From: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
> Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 16:42:28 +0200
>
> GCC 16 introduced native TLS variables on Windows, so this adds
> debugger support for them.
Thanks. Should this be called out in NEWS?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows
2026-05-08 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows Hannes Domani
2026-05-08 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2026-05-08 19:09 ` Tom Tromey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-08 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hannes Domani; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de> writes:
Hannes> I've used the fetch_tls_load_module_address gdbarch method to get the
Hannes> address of _tls_index of the OBJFILE, which is then forwarded as LM_ADDR
Hannes> to windows_get_thread_local_address, but I'm not really sure if this is
Hannes> allowed.
I think it is fine, or at most would need a small update to the comment
string explaining that the values are opaque and intended to be
target-specific.
Hannes> +/* Get the address of variable "_tls_index" of OBJFILE. */
Hannes> +
Hannes> +static CORE_ADDR
Hannes> +windows_tls_index_address (struct objfile *objfile)
Hannes> +{
Hannes> + bound_minimal_symbol minsym
Hannes> + = lookup_minimal_symbol_linkage("_tls_index", objfile, false);
Missing space.
Hannes> + gdb_byte buf[8];
Hannes> + if (target_read_memory (lm_addr, buf, 4))
Hannes> + throw_error (TLS_GENERIC_ERROR, _("Cannot read _tls_index"));
Hannes> +
Hannes> + enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch);
Hannes> + uint32_t tls_index = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, 4, byte_order);
Hannes> + CORE_ADDR tlb, tls_ptr, slot_ptr;
Hannes> + if (target_get_tib_address (ptid, &tlb)
Hannes> + && !target_read_memory (tlb + tls_offset, buf, ptr_bytes)
Hannes> + && (tls_ptr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, ptr_bytes,
Hannes> + byte_order)) != 0
Hannes> + && !target_read_memory (tls_ptr + tls_index * ptr_bytes,
Hannes> + buf, ptr_bytes)
Hannes> + && (slot_ptr = extract_unsigned_integer (buf, ptr_bytes,
Hannes> + byte_order)) != 0)
Instead of multiple assignments in an 'if' I think it'd be better to
have separate 'if's and early returns.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-08 19:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260508144232.940078-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2026-05-08 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH] Implement native TLS support on Windows Hannes Domani
2026-05-08 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2026-05-08 19:09 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox