From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR gdb/17035: "show user" doesn't list user-defined commands that have empty bodies.
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sikc1p8z.fsf@anubis.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FDC751.3000902@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2589 bytes --]
Hello Pedro,
I appreciate your comments,
>> I don't see that as a problem, because python/scheme are also user
>> commands (or, at least, are part of class_user class). Considering that
>> "help user-defined" also shows python/scheme commands, I believe it
>> would be more practical to just list them on "show user" (should we
>> update the doc string, as well).
>
> I think we'll need to track down the original discussion, and
> ask whoever was involved. Otherwise, we'd just be going in
> circles. :-)
>
> E.g., that commit changed the online help and the manual to
> try to make that clear.
>
> (gdb) help show user
> Show definitions of non-python/scheme user defined commands.
> Argument is the name of the user defined command.
> With no argument, show definitions of all user defined commands.
>
Reviewing the original discussion, (for the record,
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-02/msg00246.html>), Doug has
made a pretty good point on not showing python/scheme commands here.
Since this is a simple bug fix, I'd rather not modify the behavior
here, so I rewrote the patch to not show python/scheme commands. It got
a little simpler, since I don't have to touch a lot of testcases
anymore.
Now we use the fact that the c->function union is NULL when we have a
python/scheme command (they both use c->func directly).
I also added two testcases to make sure we are not printing scheme or
python commands, as you suggested.
>> Using the verification for cfunc/sfunc above, also avoids
>> printing the "user-defined" line.
>
> Hmm, but what is that "user-defined" command ?
user-defined is a null command. It does nothing. It is defined as
follows:
add_cmd ("user-defined", class_user, NULL, _("\
User-defined commands.\n\
The commands in this class are those defined by the user.\n\
Use the \"define\" command to define a command."), &cmdlist);
I guess it's only purpose is at help user-defined.
Do you think it is acceptable now?
gdb/
2014-08-20 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
* cli/cli-cmds.c (show_user): Verify if c->function is NULL to
decide whether c is a python/scheme command.
* cli/cli-script.c (show_user_1): Only verify cmdlines after
printing command name.
gdb/testsuite/
2014-08-20 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
* gdb.base/commands.exp: Include tests to verify user-defined
commands with empty bodies.
* gdb.python/py-cmd.exp: Don't show user-defined python commands
in `show user command`
* gdb.python/scm-cmd.exp: Don't show user-defined scheme commands
in `show user command`
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: show_user_v2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4960 bytes --]
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
index b415267..4f624f2 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
@@ -1245,8 +1245,9 @@ show_user (char *args, int from_tty)
const char *comname = args;
c = lookup_cmd (&comname, cmdlist, "", 0, 1);
- /* c->user_commands would be NULL if it's a python/scheme command. */
- if (c->class != class_user || !c->user_commands)
+ /* c->function.cfunc would be NULL if it's a python/scheme
+ command. */
+ if (c->class != class_user || c->function.cfunc == NULL)
error (_("Not a user command."));
show_user_1 (c, "", args, gdb_stdout);
}
@@ -1254,7 +1255,8 @@ show_user (char *args, int from_tty)
{
for (c = cmdlist; c; c = c->next)
{
- if (c->class == class_user || c->prefixlist != NULL)
+ if ((c->class == class_user && c->function.cfunc != NULL)
+ || c->prefixlist != NULL)
show_user_1 (c, "", c->name, gdb_stdout);
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
index 0f0a97e..37cb82a 100644
--- a/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
+++ b/gdb/cli/cli-script.c
@@ -1717,10 +1717,10 @@ show_user_1 (struct cmd_list_element *c, const char *prefix, const char *name,
}
cmdlines = c->user_commands;
- if (!cmdlines)
- return;
fprintf_filtered (stream, "User command \"%s%s\":\n", prefix, name);
+ if (!cmdlines)
+ return;
print_command_lines (current_uiout, cmdlines, 1);
fputs_filtered ("\n", stream);
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
index 7363420..b2d1c76 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp
@@ -243,6 +243,28 @@ proc user_defined_command_test {} {
gdb_test "show user mycommand" \
" while \\\$arg0.*set.* if \\\(\\\$arg0.*p/x.* else\[^\n\].*p/x.* end\[^\n\].* end\[^\n\].*" \
"display user command in user_defined_command_test"
+
+ # Create and test an user-defined command with an empty body.
+ gdb_test_multiple "define myemptycommand" \
+ "define myemptycommand in user_defined_command_test" {
+ -re "End with" {
+ pass "define myemptycommand in user_defined_command_test"
+ }
+ }
+ gdb_test "end" \
+ "" \
+ "End definition of user-defined command with empty body."
+
+ gdb_test_no_output "myemptycommand" \
+ "execute user-defined empty command in user_defined_command_test"
+
+ gdb_test "show user" \
+ "User command \"myemptycommand.*" \
+ "display empty command in command list in user_defined_command_test"
+
+ gdb_test "show user myemptycommand" \
+ "User command \"myemptycommand.*" \
+ "display user-defined emtpy command in user_defined_command_test"
}
proc watchpoint_command_test {} {
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-cmd.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-cmd.exp
index a407f63..36ef03d 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-cmd.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-cmd.exp
@@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ gdb_test "help user-defined" \
"User-defined commands.\[\r\n\]+The commands in this class are those defined by the user.\[\r\n\]+Use the \"define\" command to define a command.\[\r\n\]+List of commands:\[\r\n\]+test-help -- Docstring\[\r\n\]+Type \"help\" followed by command name for full documentation.\[\r\n\]+Type \"apropos word\" to search for commands related to \"word\".\[\r\n\]+Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous.\[\r\n\]+" \
"see user-defined command in `help user-defined`"
+# Make sure the command does not show up in `show user`.
+gdb_test "show user test-help" "Not a user command\." \
+ "Don't show user-defined scheme command in `show user command`"
+
# Test expression completion on fields.
gdb_test_multiline "expression completion command" \
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-cmd.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-cmd.exp
index a87aecb..3ae4053 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-cmd.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-cmd.exp
@@ -161,6 +161,10 @@ gdb_test "test_help ugh" "test_cmd output, arg = ugh" "call simple user-defined
# Make sure the command shows up in `help user-defined`.
gdb_test "help user-defined" "User-defined commands.\[\r\n\]+The commands in this class are those defined by the user.\[\r\n\]+Use the \"define\" command to define a command.\[\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+List of commands:\[\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+test_help -- Docstring\[\r\n\]+\[\r\n\]+Type \"help\" followed by command name for full documentation.\[\r\n\]+Type \"apropos word\" to search for commands related to \"word\".\[\r\n\]+Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous.\[\r\n\]+" "see user-defined command in `help user-defined`"
+# Make sure the command does not show up in `show user`.
+gdb_test "show user test_help" "Not a user command\." \
+ "Don't show user-defined python command in `show user command`"
+
# Test expression completion on fields
gdb_py_test_multiple "expression completion command" \
"python" "" \
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 30 bytes --]
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-31 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 6:12 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2014-08-21 15:53 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-23 2:27 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2014-08-27 11:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-08-31 18:35 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2014-09-02 12:52 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-04 19:26 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2014-09-04 19:57 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-09-05 13:12 ` Pedro Alves
2014-09-08 0:44 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2014-09-09 21:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-08-21 21:20 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sikc1p8z.fsf@anubis.Home \
--to=gabriel@krisman.be \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox