Re: [RFA] Handle var_zuinteger and var_zuinteger_unlimited from Python

[Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>]

Eli> This part is approved, but it sounds like only 1 of the 3 differences
Eli> from PARAM_ZUINTEGER should actually be mentioned, as the other 2 --
Eli> that 0 is interpreted as itself and negative values are generally not
Eli> allowed -- are already present in PARAM_ZUINTEGER.  Or did I miss
Eli> something?

Tom> No, you didn't, that seems correct to me.
Tom> Also the value is actually signed.

Tom> I've changed it to:

Tom>     The value is an signed integer.  This is like @code{PARAM_ZUINTEGER},
Tom>     except the special value -1 should be interpreted to mean
Tom>     ``unlimited''.  Other negative values are not allowed.

So what I actually wrote and what you wrote that I agreed with are not
the same: I left in the text about other negative values.  I thought
this still made sense given that the value is actually signed, but let
me know which way you'd prefer.

thanks,
Tom