From: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Farre via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] gdb/python: Add BreakpointLocation type
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:31:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r12nslj7.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220607115748.484438-1-simon.farre.cx@gmail.com> (Simon Farre via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:57:48 +0200")
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Farre via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
Simon> +static int find_loc_num_by_location (bp_location* loc);
I think it would be better to rearrange this so that the forward
declaration isn't needed.
Simon> +@defvar Breakpoint.locations
Simon> +Get the most current list of breakpoint locations that are inserted for this
Simon> +breakpoint, with elements of type @code{gdb.BreakpointLocation}
Simon> +(described below). This functionality matches that of the
Simon> +@code{info breakpoint} command (@pxref{Set Breaks}), in that it only retrieves
Simon> +the most current list of locations, thus the list itself when returned is
Simon> +not updated behind the scenes. This attribute is not writable.
Simon> +@end defvar
I used this patch for some work I'm doing and I found this description a
bit hard to follow. Maybe the "This functionality..." sentence could
be replaced with one that just says "This does not cause gdb to update
the underlying list of locations"?
Simon> +@defvar BreakpointLocation.source
Simon> +This attribute returns the source file path and line number where this location
Simon> +was set. The type of the attribute is a tuple of @var{string} and
Simon> +@var{long}. If the breakpoint location doesn't have a source location,
I think nowadays there is only 'int' in Python.
This occurs a bit later in the text as well.
Simon> +/* Python function to get the breakpoint locations of an owner breakpoint. */
Simon> +
Simon> +static PyObject*
Space before "*".
Simon> +static PyObject *
Simon> +bplocpy_get_source_location (PyObject *py_self, void *closure)
Simon> +{
[...]
Simon> + auto line = gdb_py_object_from_ulongest (self->bp_loc->line_number);
I think a null check is needed here.
Simon> +static PyObject *
Simon> +bplocpy_get_thread_groups (PyObject *py_self, void *closure)
[...]
Simon> + if (PyList_Append (list.get (),
Simon> + gdb_py_object_from_ulongest(inf->num).release()) != 0)
Simon> + return nullptr;
The formatting looks weird here, but also gdb_py_object_from_ulongest
has to be called separately and the result checked for nullptr.
Note there's also a missing space before the "(".
Simon> diff --git a/gdb/python/python-internal.h b/gdb/python/python-internal.h
Simon> index d947b96033b..7c4648e6042 100644
Simon> --- a/gdb/python/python-internal.h
Simon> +++ b/gdb/python/python-internal.h
Simon> @@ -322,12 +322,10 @@ struct gdbpy_breakpoint_object
Simon> } \
Simon> } while (0)
Simon> -
Simon> /* Variables used to pass information between the Breakpoint
Simon> constructor and the breakpoint-created hook function. */
Simon> extern gdbpy_breakpoint_object *bppy_pending_object;
Simon> -
Simon> struct thread_object
Simon> {
Simon> PyObject_HEAD
This seems like a spurious change.
Simon> + Copyright 2022-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Don't need a range here.
Simon> --- /dev/null
Simon> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-bp-locations.exp
Simon> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
Simon> +# Copyright (C) 2022-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Here either.
thanks,
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-07 11:57 Simon Farre via Gdb-patches
2022-07-14 16:31 ` Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-07-28 17:47 ` Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r12nslj7.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox