From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: LRN <lrn1986@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Bug win32/14529] Make gdb capable of JIT-debugging on W32
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87obldd9s4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504D4EE1.5010507@gmail.com> (LRN's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:22:25 +0400")
>>>>> "LRN" == LRN <lrn1986@gmail.com> writes:
LRN> diff --git a/gdb/infcmd.c b/gdb/infcmd.c
[...]
LRN> +#if W32_JITDBG
LRN> +void
LRN> +signal_event_command (char *args, int from_tty)
LRN> +{
Two notes here.
First, does it make sense to put this in windows-nat.c instead?
(I don't know anything about the Windows port...)
It doesn't matter hugely.
Second, it is odd to call this a _command and give it the above
prototype. Normally this convention is used for things which are really
commands -- visible to the user from the gdb CLI.
I suppose this is so you can use catch_command_errors; but it seems like
you could equally well use catch_errors.
LRN> + struct cleanup *back_to = make_cleanup (null_cleanup, NULL);
You don't need a null cleanup unless you plan to make other cleanups.
But AFAICT there aren't any.
LRN> + dont_repeat (); /* Not for the faint of heart */
You only need this for a real command.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 17:55 LRN
2012-08-31 14:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-08-31 15:37 ` Christopher Faylor
2012-08-31 15:40 ` LRN
2012-08-31 15:37 ` LRN
2012-09-10 2:22 ` LRN
2012-09-10 18:15 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-09-10 18:32 ` LRN
2012-09-11 18:21 ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-11 18:27 ` LRN
2012-09-11 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-11 18:09 ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-11 18:23 ` LRN
2012-09-11 18:27 ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-11 18:31 ` LRN
2012-09-29 12:42 ` LRN
2012-09-29 13:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-29 19:32 ` LRN
2012-09-30 7:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-30 12:46 ` LRN
2012-10-01 13:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-10-01 16:22 ` LRN
2012-10-01 22:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-10-01 22:48 ` LRN
2012-10-02 5:53 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2012-10-02 12:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-10-02 12:57 ` LRN
2016-06-30 13:17 ` LRN
2016-06-30 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-06-30 15:44 ` LRN
2016-06-30 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-06-30 17:19 ` LRN
2016-06-30 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-06-30 18:36 ` LRN
2016-06-30 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-06-30 19:14 ` LRN
2016-07-02 1:16 ` LRN
2016-07-02 7:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-10 13:06 ` LRN
2016-07-10 14:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-18 10:08 ` LRN
2016-07-19 19:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-20 4:43 ` LRN
2016-07-23 8:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87obldd9s4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=lrn1986@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox