From: Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change handling of '!' operator in stap probes
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 21:49:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8hnot6q.fsf@paluero> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfcy5f19.fsf@paluero> (Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:52:02 -0500")
On Tuesday, January 12 2021, Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches wrote:
> On Sunday, January 03 2020, Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, December 31 2020, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>
>>> While working on the expression rewrite, I noticed that the '!'
>>> operator is handled as if it were a binary operator. However, this
>>> seems incorrect. Instead, I think it should be handled alongside the
>>> other unary operators in stap_parse_single_operand.
>>>
>>> This patch makes this change.
>
> Ping.
Ping^2.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, Tom.
>>
>> This code was written based on the information contained here:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Infix-Ops.html
>>
>> You can see that it says:
>>
>> !
>> Bitwise Or Not
>>
>> The problem is that, when we examine gas' source code, we see that it
>> doesn't treat '!' as "bitwise or not" (fortunately!), but as the
>> "logical not":
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gas/symbols.c;h=f6e4b718ef719eef8a7e6e29dbadf3605058403d;hb=HEAD#l1128
>>
>> OK, this means that our stap-probe.c is not completely wrong: the enum
>> should indeed be named UNOP_LOGICAL_NOT.
>>
>> Now, when we check to see if the precedence assigned to UNOP_LOGICAL_NOT
>> is the right one, we see that it is:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gas/expr.c;h=1b420d928cde50456af0137529b8215294ba521d;hb=HEAD#l1481
>>
>>
>> /* Rank Examples
>> 0 operand, (expression)
>> 1 ||
>> 2 &&
>> 3 == <> < <= >= >
>> 4 + -
>> 5 used for * / % in MRI mode
>> 6 & ^ ! |
>> ...
>>
>> Huh, interesting. Anyway, this whole investigation (plus the fact that,
>> as you mentioned, we don't have tests to exercise this part of the code)
>> made me uncover a few latent bugs on the stap parser code, so I'm
>> sending a patch that incorporates part of your changes and also fixes
>> the issues I found. As a bonus, I'm proposing a new testcase
>> (amd64-only) to make sure that we expand the coverage of this code.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> --
>> Sergio
>> GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
>> Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
>> https://sergiodj.net/
>>
>> From da02db7cacef62ce085d5715b1339b24d8f2260c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
>> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2021 02:42:52 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix a few stap parser issues and add a new test for probe
>> expressions
>>
>> The creation of this patch was motivated by Tom's "Change handling of
>> '!' operator in stap probes" patch.
>>
>> While reviewing his patch, I stumbled upon a few issues with the stap
>> expression parser. They are:
>>
>> - As it turns out, even with Tom's patch applied the parser doesn't
>> properly handle the '!' operator. The underlying issue was the fact
>> that stap_parse_argument_conditionally also needed to be patched in
>> order to recognize '!' as an operator that is part of a single
>> operand, and parse it accordingly.
>>
>> - While writing the testcase I'm proposing on this patch, I found that
>> parenthesized sub-expressions were not being parsed correctly when
>> there was another term after them. For example:
>>
>> 1 - (2 + 3) + 4
>>
>> In this case, the parser was considering "1" to be the left-side of
>> the expression, and "(2 + 3) + 4" to be the right-side. The patch
>> fixes the parser by making it identify whether a parenthesized
>> sub-expression has just been parsed, and act accordingly.
>>
>> I've tested this on my Debian testing amd64, and everything seems OK.
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>> 2021-01-03 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
>> Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>>
>> * stap-probe.c (stap_parse_single_operand): Handle '!'
>> operator.
>> (stap_parse_argument_conditionally): Likewise.
>> Skip spaces after processing open-parenthesis sub-expression.
>> (stap_parse_argument_1): Skip spaces after call to
>> stap_parse_argument_conditionally.
>> Handle case when right-side expression is a parenthesized
>> sub-expression.
>> Skip spaces after call to stap_parse_argument_1.
>>
>> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 2021-01-03 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
>>
>> * gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S: New file.
>> * gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp: New file.
>> ---
>> gdb/stap-probe.c | 31 +++++++--
>> .../gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S | 43 ++++++++++++
>> .../gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S
>> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/stap-probe.c b/gdb/stap-probe.c
>> index c2ddd047f6..224dd5714f 100644
>> --- a/gdb/stap-probe.c
>> +++ b/gdb/stap-probe.c
>> @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ stap_parse_single_operand (struct stap_parse_info *p)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - if (*p->arg == '-' || *p->arg == '~' || *p->arg == '+')
>> + if (*p->arg == '-' || *p->arg == '~' || *p->arg == '+' || *p->arg == '!')
>> {
>> char c = *p->arg;
>> /* We use this variable to do a lookahead. */
>> @@ -924,6 +924,8 @@ stap_parse_single_operand (struct stap_parse_info *p)
>> write_exp_elt_opcode (&p->pstate, UNOP_NEG);
>> else if (c == '~')
>> write_exp_elt_opcode (&p->pstate, UNOP_COMPLEMENT);
>> + else if (c == '!')
>> + write_exp_elt_opcode (&p->pstate, UNOP_LOGICAL_NOT);
>> }
>> }
>> else if (isdigit (*p->arg))
>> @@ -1012,7 +1014,7 @@ stap_parse_argument_conditionally (struct stap_parse_info *p)
>> {
>> gdb_assert (gdbarch_stap_is_single_operand_p (p->gdbarch));
>>
>> - if (*p->arg == '-' || *p->arg == '~' || *p->arg == '+' /* Unary. */
>> + if (*p->arg == '-' || *p->arg == '~' || *p->arg == '+' || *p->arg == '!'
>> || isdigit (*p->arg)
>> || gdbarch_stap_is_single_operand (p->gdbarch, p->arg))
>> stap_parse_single_operand (p);
>> @@ -1027,11 +1029,12 @@ stap_parse_argument_conditionally (struct stap_parse_info *p)
>>
>> stap_parse_argument_1 (p, 0, STAP_OPERAND_PREC_NONE);
>>
>> - --p->inside_paren_p;
>> + p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>> if (*p->arg != ')')
>> - error (_("Missign close-paren on expression `%s'."),
>> + error (_("Missign close-parenthesis on expression `%s'."),
>> p->saved_arg);
>>
>> + --p->inside_paren_p;
>> ++p->arg;
>> if (p->inside_paren_p)
>> p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>> @@ -1067,6 +1070,9 @@ stap_parse_argument_1 (struct stap_parse_info *p, bool has_lhs,
>> stap_parse_argument_conditionally (p);
>> }
>>
>> + if (p->inside_paren_p)
>> + p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>> +
>> /* Start to parse the right-side, and to "join" left and right sides
>> depending on the operation specified.
>>
>> @@ -1104,8 +1110,21 @@ stap_parse_argument_1 (struct stap_parse_info *p, bool has_lhs,
>> if (p->inside_paren_p)
>> p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>>
>> - /* Parse the right-side of the expression. */
>> + /* Parse the right-side of the expression.
>> +
>> + We save whether the right-side is a parenthesized
>> + subexpression because, if it is, we will have to finish
>> + processing this part of the expression before continuing. */
>> + bool paren_subexp = *p->arg == '(';
>> +
>> stap_parse_argument_conditionally (p);
>> + if (p->inside_paren_p)
>> + p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>> + if (paren_subexp)
>> + {
>> + write_exp_elt_opcode (&p->pstate, opcode);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>>
>> /* While we still have operators, try to parse another
>> right-side, but using the current right-side as a left-side. */
>> @@ -1130,6 +1149,8 @@ stap_parse_argument_1 (struct stap_parse_info *p, bool has_lhs,
>> /* Parse the right-side of the expression, but since we already
>> have a left-side at this point, set `has_lhs' to 1. */
>> stap_parse_argument_1 (p, 1, lookahead_prec);
>> + if (p->inside_paren_p)
>> + p->arg = skip_spaces (p->arg);
>> }
>>
>> write_exp_elt_opcode (&p->pstate, opcode);
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..76a47aa9b5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> +/* Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> +
>> + This file is part of GDB.
>> +
>> + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
>> + (at your option) any later version.
>> +
>> + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +
>> + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
>> +
>> +#include <sys/sdt.h>
>> +
>> + .file "amd64-stap-expressions.S"
>> + .text
>> + .globl main
>> +main:
>> + /* We use a nop here because we don't want the first probe to
>> + be placed at the same location as the main label. */
>> + nop
>> +
>> + /* Single operands. */
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, log_neg, 8@!($0+$1))
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, minus, -8@-($3+$4))
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, bit_neg, -8@~$22)
>> +
>> + /* Arithmetic expressions. */
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, plus1, 8@$3+($10-$8)-$1)
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, plus2, 8@$100-( ($8+$10) -$50)+$3)
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, plus3, 8@$100-(($8+$10)-$50)+((($8 - $9) + $40) - $4)+$4)
>> +
>> + /* Bitwise expressions. */
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, and, 8@$128&$128)
>> + STAP_PROBE1(probe, or, 8@$8|$4)
>> +
>> + xor %rax,%rax
>> + ret
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..5e3cb60a9e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-stap-expressions.exp
>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>> +# Copyright 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> +
>> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
>> +# (at your option) any later version.
>> +#
>> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +#
>> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> +
>> +standard_testfile ".S"
>> +
>> +if { ![istarget "x86_64-*-*"] || ![is_lp64_target] } {
>> + verbose "Skipping $testfile.exp"
>> + return
>> +}
>> +
>> +if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } {
>> + return -1
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Helper procedure to go to probe NAME
>> +
>> +proc goto_probe { name } {
>> + global decimal hex
>> +
>> + gdb_test "break -pstap $name" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex"
>> + gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint $decimal, main \\(\\) at .*\r\n.*STAP_PROBE1.*${name},.*\\)"
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Helper procedure to test the probe's argument
>> +
>> +proc test_probe_value { value } {
>> + gdb_test "print \$_probe_argc" "= 1"
>> + gdb_test "print \$_probe_arg0" "= $value"
>> +}
>> +
>> +if { ![runto_main] } {
>> + return -1
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Name and expected value for each probe.
>> +set probe_names_and_values {
>> + { "log_neg" "0" }
>> + { "minus" "-7" }
>> + { "bit_neg" "-23" }
>> +
>> + { "plus1" "4" }
>> + { "plus2" "135" }
>> + { "plus3" "171" }
>> +
>> + { "and" "128" }
>> + { "or" "12" }
>> +}
>> +
>> +foreach probe_info $probe_names_and_values {
>> + set name [lindex $probe_info 0]
>> + set value [lindex $probe_info 1]
>> + with_test_prefix $name {
>> + goto_probe $name
>> + test_probe_value $value
>> + }
>> +}
>> --
>>
>> 2.29.2
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sergio
> GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
> Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
> https://sergiodj.net/
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
https://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-31 23:02 Tom Tromey
2021-01-03 7:59 ` Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 15:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 2:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-01-20 18:40 ` Tom Tromey
2021-01-20 18:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8hnot6q.fsf@paluero \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@sergiodj.net \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox