Re: [PATCH] guile: Remove (gdb init) module, and include 'init.scm'.

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Hi, Doug,

Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> This patch is a prerequisite for the following (compiling Scheme
>> files).  It removes the (gdb init), which had a top-level circular
>> dependency with (gdb), thereby preventing compilation.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo’.
>>
>> gdb/
>> 2014-06-20  Ludovic Courtès  <ludo@gnu.org>
>>
>> 	* guile/guile.c: (gdbscm_init_module_name): Change to "gdb".
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb.scm: Remove 'use-modules' form and include
>> 	gdb/init.scm.  Change 're-export' to 'export'.  Export
>> 	'*pretty-printers*' and '%assert-type'.
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb/init.scm: Remove 'define-module' form.
>> 	(%exception-print-style): Remove.
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb/boot.scm: Change (gdb init) to (gdb).
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb/experimental.scm: Remove use of (gdb init).
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb/types.scm: Likewise.
>> 	* guile/lib/gdb/printing.scm: Add '%assert-type', 'SCM_ARG1', and
>> 	'*pretty-printers*' to the selection.
>
> Hi.
>
> IWBN to not export %assert-type.
> I was also thinking IWBN to not export *pretty-printers* and instead
> export a function that returns the value.  WDYT?

I agree, but that was needed for gdb/printing.scm.

That said, we may be able to access them from there using ‘@@’.  Perhaps
that’d be preferable.  I can try that if you want.  WDYT?

> btw, is (include ...) documented anywhere?

Yes (info "(guile) Local Inclusion").

Thanks,
Ludo’.