Re: PATCH to gdb/linux-nat.c

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> writes:

| On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:37:49AM -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> writes:
| > 
| > | On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 03:08:38AM -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > | > 2007-02-09  Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
| > | > 
| > | > 	* linux-nat.c (linux_nat_find_memory_regions): Don't check the
| > | > 	address of 'filename'; it is always non null.
| > | 
| > | OK, thanks.  Do you have write access to GDB?  If not, do you want it?
| > 
| > A while ago, when libstdc++-v3 was a standalone project, I had an
| > account on sourceware.  I think things have changed over the years, so
| > yes, I'll welcome a write access t GDB.  Thanks!
| 
| OK, now you have write access.  Please commit this, and post and commit
| a patch adding yourself to the write-after-approval list in
| gdb/MAINTAINERS.  Thanks for the patch!

Great; that was quick!  Many thanks.

One more favor:  Would you mind looking at my other patch?  The GCC PR
I filled was demonstrated to be a duplicate and nothing happened
since the first PR was filled; I believe GDB+GCC-4.2.0 is affected too.  I
think the patch I sent works around the problem within GDB and
"improves" the const-correctness of the two functions involved.

Thanks,

-- Gaby