Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: thiago.bauermann@linaro.org, luis.machado@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] gdb, gdbarch: Enable inferior calls for shadow stack support.
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 11:42:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikjac63j.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250628082810.332526-10-christina.schimpe@intel.com>

Christina Schimpe <christina.schimpe@intel.com> writes:

> Inferior calls in GDB reset the current PC to the beginning of the function
> that is called.  As no call instruction is executed the new return address
> needs to be pushed to the shadow stack and the shadow stack pointer needs
> to be updated.
>
> This commit adds a new gdbarch method to push an address on the shadow
> stack.  The method is used to adapt the function 'call_function_by_hand_dummy'
> for inferior call shadow stack support.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>

LGTM.

Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Andrew


> ---
>  gdb/gdbarch-gen.c         | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/gdbarch-gen.h         | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  gdb/gdbarch_components.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  gdb/infcall.c             | 14 ++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch-gen.c b/gdb/gdbarch-gen.c
> index fc570d37a8d..a4b72793fd8 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch-gen.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch-gen.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ struct gdbarch
>    gdbarch_read_core_file_mappings_ftype *read_core_file_mappings = default_read_core_file_mappings;
>    gdbarch_use_target_description_from_corefile_notes_ftype *use_target_description_from_corefile_notes = default_use_target_description_from_corefile_notes;
>    gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context_ftype *core_parse_exec_context = default_core_parse_exec_context;
> +  gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_ftype *shadow_stack_push = nullptr;
>  };
>  
>  /* Create a new ``struct gdbarch'' based on information provided by
> @@ -535,6 +536,7 @@ verify_gdbarch (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
>    /* Skip verify of read_core_file_mappings, invalid_p == 0.  */
>    /* Skip verify of use_target_description_from_corefile_notes, invalid_p == 0.  */
>    /* Skip verify of core_parse_exec_context, invalid_p == 0.  */
> +  /* Skip verify of shadow_stack_push, has predicate.  */
>    if (!log.empty ())
>      internal_error (_("verify_gdbarch: the following are invalid ...%s"),
>  		    log.c_str ());
> @@ -1406,6 +1408,12 @@ gdbarch_dump (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file)
>    gdb_printf (file,
>  	      "gdbarch_dump: core_parse_exec_context = <%s>\n",
>  	      host_address_to_string (gdbarch->core_parse_exec_context));
> +  gdb_printf (file,
> +	      "gdbarch_dump: gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_p() = %d\n",
> +	      gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_p (gdbarch));
> +  gdb_printf (file,
> +	      "gdbarch_dump: shadow_stack_push = <%s>\n",
> +	      host_address_to_string (gdbarch->shadow_stack_push));
>    if (gdbarch->dump_tdep != NULL)
>      gdbarch->dump_tdep (gdbarch, file);
>  }
> @@ -5551,3 +5559,27 @@ set_gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>  {
>    gdbarch->core_parse_exec_context = core_parse_exec_context;
>  }
> +
> +bool
> +gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
> +{
> +  gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
> +  return gdbarch->shadow_stack_push != NULL;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +gdbarch_shadow_stack_push (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR new_addr, regcache *regcache)
> +{
> +  gdb_assert (gdbarch != NULL);
> +  gdb_assert (gdbarch->shadow_stack_push != NULL);
> +  if (gdbarch_debug >= 2)
> +    gdb_printf (gdb_stdlog, "gdbarch_shadow_stack_push called\n");
> +  gdbarch->shadow_stack_push (gdbarch, new_addr, regcache);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +set_gdbarch_shadow_stack_push (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> +			       gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_ftype shadow_stack_push)
> +{
> +  gdbarch->shadow_stack_push = shadow_stack_push;
> +}
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch-gen.h b/gdb/gdbarch-gen.h
> index 281b97b7aa8..71142332540 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch-gen.h
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch-gen.h
> @@ -1802,3 +1802,17 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_use_target_description_from_corefile_notes (struct gdbar
>  typedef core_file_exec_context (gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, bfd *cbfd);
>  extern core_file_exec_context gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, bfd *cbfd);
>  extern void set_gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_core_parse_exec_context_ftype *core_parse_exec_context);
> +
> +/* Some targets support special hardware-assisted control-flow protection
> +   technologies.  For example, the Intel Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
> +   (Intel CET) on x86 provides a shadow stack and indirect branch tracking.
> +   To enable shadow stack support for inferior calls the shadow_stack_push
> +   gdbarch hook has to be provided.
> +
> +   Push NEW_ADDR to the shadow stack and update the shadow stack pointer. */
> +
> +extern bool gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
> +
> +typedef void (gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_ftype) (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR new_addr, regcache *regcache);
> +extern void gdbarch_shadow_stack_push (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR new_addr, regcache *regcache);
> +extern void set_gdbarch_shadow_stack_push (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_ftype *shadow_stack_push);
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch_components.py b/gdb/gdbarch_components.py
> index 91c867e69bf..abc79588473 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbarch_components.py
> +++ b/gdb/gdbarch_components.py
> @@ -2848,3 +2848,19 @@ which all assume current_inferior() is the one to read from.
>      predefault="default_core_parse_exec_context",
>      invalid=False,
>  )
> +
> +Method(
> +    comment="""
> +Some targets support special hardware-assisted control-flow protection
> +technologies.  For example, the Intel Control-Flow Enforcement Technology
> +(Intel CET) on x86 provides a shadow stack and indirect branch tracking.
> +To enable shadow stack support for inferior calls the shadow_stack_push
> +gdbarch hook has to be provided.
> +
> +Push NEW_ADDR to the shadow stack and update the shadow stack pointer.
> +""",
> +    type="void",
> +    name="shadow_stack_push",
> +    params=[("CORE_ADDR", "new_addr"), ("regcache *", "regcache")],
> +    predicate=True,
> +)
> diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c
> index 2b5936d1621..db6d6774367 100644
> --- a/gdb/infcall.c
> +++ b/gdb/infcall.c
> @@ -1448,10 +1448,16 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function,
>    /* Create the dummy stack frame.  Pass in the call dummy address as,
>       presumably, the ABI code knows where, in the call dummy, the
>       return address should be pointed.  */
> -  sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, function,
> -				get_thread_regcache (inferior_thread ()),
> -				bp_addr, args.size (), args.data (),
> -				sp, return_method, struct_addr);
> +  regcache *regcache = get_thread_regcache (inferior_thread ());
> +  sp = gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, function, regcache, bp_addr,
> +				args.size (), args.data (), sp,
> +				return_method, struct_addr);
> +
> +  /* Push the return address of the inferior (bp_addr) to the shadow stack
> +     and update the shadow stack pointer.  As we don't execute a call
> +     instruction to call the function we need to handle this manually.  */
> +  if (gdbarch_shadow_stack_push_p (gdbarch))
> +    gdbarch_shadow_stack_push (gdbarch, bp_addr, regcache);
>  
>    /* Set up a frame ID for the dummy frame so we can pass it to
>       set_momentary_breakpoint.  We need to give the breakpoint a frame
> -- 
> 2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-30 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-28  8:27 [PATCH v5 00/12] Add CET " Christina Schimpe
2025-06-28  8:27 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] gdb, testsuite: Extend core_find procedure to save program output Christina Schimpe
2025-07-14 12:21   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-17 13:37     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] gdbserver: Add optional runtime register set type Christina Schimpe
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] gdbserver: Add assert in x86_linux_read_description Christina Schimpe
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] gdb: Sync up x86-gcc-cpuid.h with cpuid.h from gcc 14 branch Christina Schimpe
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] gdb, gdbserver: Use xstate_bv for target description creation on x86 Christina Schimpe
2025-07-14 13:52   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-15 10:28     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-23 12:47       ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-05 13:47         ` Andrew Burgess
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] gdb, gdbserver: Add support of Intel shadow stack pointer register Christina Schimpe
2025-07-25 12:49   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-25 15:03     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-01 12:54       ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-05 13:57       ` Andrew Burgess
2025-08-06 19:53         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-06 19:54           ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-07  3:17             ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-08-14 11:39           ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-29 13:51   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-08-01 12:40     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-10 19:01   ` H.J. Lu
2025-08-10 20:07     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] gdb: amd64 linux coredump support with shadow stack Christina Schimpe
2025-07-29 14:46   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-30  1:55     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-07-30 11:42       ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-04 15:28         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-05  4:29           ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-08-05 15:29             ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-06 20:52             ` Luis
2025-08-11 11:52               ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-04 12:45     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] gdb: Handle shadow stack pointer register unwinding for amd64 linux Christina Schimpe
2025-07-30  9:58   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-30 12:06     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] gdb, gdbarch: Enable inferior calls for shadow stack support Christina Schimpe
2025-07-30 10:42   ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] gdb: Implement amd64 linux shadow stack support for inferior calls Christina Schimpe
2025-07-30 11:58   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-31 12:32     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] gdb, gdbarch: Introduce gdbarch method to get the shadow stack pointer Christina Schimpe
2025-07-30 12:22   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-08-04 13:01     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-14 15:50       ` Andrew Burgess
2025-08-19 15:37         ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-06-28  8:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] gdb: Enable displaced stepping with shadow stack on amd64 linux Christina Schimpe
2025-07-30 13:59   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-07-31 17:29     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-08 15:18 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Add CET shadow stack support Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-14  7:52   ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-11 10:36 ` Luis Machado
2025-07-11 13:54   ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-11 15:54     ` Luis Machado
2025-07-13 14:01       ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-13 19:05         ` Luis Machado
2025-07-13 19:57           ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-14  7:13           ` Luis Machado
2025-07-17 12:01             ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-17 14:59               ` Luis Machado
2025-07-23 12:45                 ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-07-28 17:05                   ` Luis Machado
2025-07-28 17:20                     ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-20  9:16 ` Schimpe, Christina
2025-08-20 15:21   ` Schimpe, Christina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ikjac63j.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox