Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb] Update syscalls/{amd64,i386}-linux.xml
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:07:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee0tea14.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22cb80d8-3537-1d66-c54a-3e46630460dc@suse.de> (Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 10 May 2022 13:53:37 +0200")

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Tom> On 5/9/22 12:39, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> [ FWIW, it seems the linux kernel migrated to some syscall.tbl
>> approach, and perhaps generating from there could be an option. ]

Tom> Well, I gave that a try, in a separate script update-linux-2.sh
Tom> (haven't though of a good name yet).

Tom> Any comments?

Maybe it should just replace update-linux.sh?

Tom> In particular, there are a few new "reserved<n>" and "unused<n>"
Tom> entries that don't look problematic to me, but perhaps these should be
Tom> filtered out.

I think it seems better to skip them.

Anyway if this is the direction Linux is going, like if this .tbl file
is some authoritative source, then I think it makes the most sense for
gdb to follow.

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-03 14:57 [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Handle pipe2 syscall in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-05 11:47 ` [PATCH, v2][gdb/testsuite] " Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-05 11:49   ` [PATCH][gdb/tdep] Support catch syscall pipe2 for i386 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-05 13:20     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 10:26       ` [PATCH][gdb] Add gdb/syscalls/Makefile Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 14:41         ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 14:46           ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 10:39       ` [PATCH][gdb] Update syscalls/{amd64,i386}-linux.xml Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 14:48         ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 15:29           ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 15:40             ` Andreas Schwab
2022-05-09 15:42               ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 15:45                 ` Andreas Schwab
2022-05-09 16:04                   ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 17:19         ` Tom Tromey
2022-05-10 11:39           ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-12  9:00             ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-10 11:53         ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-16 16:07           ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2022-05-18  9:58             ` [committed][gdb/tdep] Add gdb/syscalls/update-linux-from-src.sh Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-05-05 13:23   ` [PATCH, v2][gdb/testsuite] Handle pipe2 syscall in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-05-09 10:18     ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ee0tea14.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox