From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@labware.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] gdb: simplify find_compunit_symtab_for_pc_sect
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:02:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecmg4i39.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219185638.360694-4-jan.vrany@labware.com> (Jan Vrany's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:56:34 +0000")
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@labware.com> writes:
Jan> This commit simplifies find_compunit_symtab_for_pc_sect by removing the
Jan> code that walks over all (currently expanded) CUs and delegating to
Jan> quick_symbol_functions::find_pc_sect_compunit_symtab instead.
Jan> With this commit on Linux x86_64 I see no regression. With -readnow
Jan> there are some regressions, mainly caused by slightly different order
Jan> of expanding CUs. Since there's a proposal to remove -readnow support,
Jan> I have not fixed nor investigated failing tests in depth.
I think that proposal was rejected so I'm afraid you'll have to revisit
that.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 18:56 [PATCH 0/7] Remove addrmap from blockvector Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] gdb: implement readnow_functions::find_pc_sect_compunit_symtab Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:01 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-20 12:36 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-20 14:25 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-20 15:57 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] gdb: update expanded_symbols_functions::find_pc_sect_compunit_symtab Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:02 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] gdb: simplify find_compunit_symtab_for_pc_sect Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:02 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2026-02-20 12:40 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-20 14:25 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-26 15:00 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] gdb: do not set blockvector address map Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:03 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-20 12:42 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] gdb: update blockvector::lookup to handle non-contiguous blocks Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:06 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-19 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
2026-02-20 13:03 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-20 16:38 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-03 11:06 ` Jan Vraný
2026-03-09 15:52 ` Jan Vraný
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] gdb: remove address map from struct blockvector Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 18:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] gdb: add unit test for blockvector::lookup of non-contiguous blocks Jan Vrany
2026-02-19 20:12 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecmg4i39.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.vrany@labware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox