From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb, remote: fix set_thread () in start_remote ()
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 01:29:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy8yzfu4.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250805071914.3832823-2-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (Markus Metzger's message of "Tue, 5 Aug 2025 07:19:14 +0000")
Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> writes:
> remote_target::start_remote_1 () calls set_continue_thread (minus_one_ptid)
> with the intent to
>
> /* Let the stub know that we want it to return the thread. */
> set_continue_thread (minus_one_ptid);
>
> I interpret it such that it expects a later get_current_thread () to
> return the thread selected by the target:
>
> /* We have thread information; select the thread the target
> says should be current. If we're reconnecting to a
> multi-threaded program, this will ideally be the thread
> that last reported an event before GDB disconnected. */
> ptid_t curr_thread = get_current_thread (wait_status);
Oh, that makes sense. Thanks for digging into it!
> This results in the packet sequence Hc-1, qC.
>
> Hc simply sets cont_thread:
>
> else if (cs.own_buf[1] == 'c')
> cs.cont_thread = thread_id;
>
> write_ok (cs.own_buf);
>
> and qC returns the general thread. This doesn't match.
🤦
> It also has some special treatment for null_ptid and minus_one_ptid:
>
> if (cs.general_thread != null_ptid && cs.general_thread != minus_one_ptid)
> ptid = cs.general_thread;
> else
> {
> init_thread_iter ();
> ptid = thread_iter->id;
> }
>
> Similarly, Hg has some special treatment for null_ptid:
>
> if (cs.own_buf[1] == 'g')
> {
> if (thread_id == null_ptid)
> {
> /* GDB is telling us to choose any thread. Check if
> the currently selected thread is still valid. If
> it is not, select the first available. */
> thread_info *thread = find_thread_ptid (cs.general_thread);
> if (thread == NULL)
> thread = get_first_thread ();
> thread_id = thread->id;
> }
>
> cs.general_thread = thread_id;
>
> The comment at Hg matches the intent of GDB for sending Hc-1.
Indeed!
> Change the set_thread () call in remote_target::start_remote_1 () to
>
> set_general_thread (any_thread_ptid);
>
> This results in GDB sending Hg0 and gdbserver preserving the currently
> selected thread that is later returned in response to qC.
>
> CC: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
> ---
> gdb/remote.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Great! My only suggestion is to try to make the GDB comments more
consistent:
> diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
> index 6208a90f94a..9b76578bd80 100644
> --- a/gdb/remote.c
> +++ b/gdb/remote.c
> @@ -5293,7 +5293,7 @@ remote_target::start_remote_1 (int from_tty, int extended_p)
> target_update_thread_list ();
>
> /* Let the stub know that we want it to return the thread. */
This comment is a bit cryptic. What about something like:
/* Let the stub know that we want it to return the thread id in the
qC reply from the get_current_thread call below. */
> - set_continue_thread (minus_one_ptid);
> + set_general_thread (any_thread_ptid);
>
> if (thread_count (this) == 0)
> {
Also, your explanation implies that the doc comment in
remote_target::set_thread isn't quite right. What about changing it to
something along the following lines?
-/* If PTID is MAGIC_NULL_PTID, don't set any thread. If PTID is
- MINUS_ONE_PTID, set the thread to -1, so the stub returns the
- thread. If GEN is set, set the general thread, if not, then set
- the step/continue thread. */
+/* If PTID is MAGIC_NULL_PTID or ANY_THREAD_PTID, set the thread to 0.
+ If PTID is MINUS_ONE_PTID, set the thread to -1. If GEN is set, set
+ the general thread, if not, then set the step/continue thread. If
+ the thread is 0 or -1 and GEN is set, the stub returns the thread in
+ the qC packet reply. */
void
remote_target::set_thread (ptid_t ptid, int gen)
{
@@ -3267,6 +3268,7 @@ remote_target::set_thread (ptid_t ptid, int gen)
*buf++ = 'H';
*buf++ = gen ? 'g' : 'c';
+ /* NB: gdbserver interprets 0 and -1 the same way in the H packet. */
if (ptid == magic_null_ptid)
xsnprintf (buf, endbuf - buf, "0");
else if (ptid == any_thread_ptid)
One final comment: I agree with your conclusions, but unfortunately I'm
not sure of them. The doc comment in remote_target::set_thread gives me
a bit of pause. Because of that I don't think I should add a
Reviewed-by.
Hopefully someone with more experience with the RSP and remote stubs can
weigh in.
--
Thiago
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 7:19 [PATCH 1/2] gdbserver, read_ptid: handle '0' and '-1' thread ids Markus Metzger
2025-08-05 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] gdb, remote: fix set_thread () in start_remote () Markus Metzger
2025-08-14 4:29 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2025-08-14 22:28 ` Simon Marchi
2025-08-15 0:29 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-08-15 5:33 ` Simon Marchi
2025-08-18 1:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-09-22 13:29 ` Metzger, Markus T
2025-08-14 3:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] gdbserver, read_ptid: handle '0' and '-1' thread ids Thiago Jung Bauermann
2025-08-14 20:40 ` Simon Marchi
2025-09-22 13:29 ` Metzger, Markus T
2025-09-23 18:26 ` Tom Tromey
2025-09-24 8:04 ` Metzger, Markus T
2025-09-26 6:43 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cy8yzfu4.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox