From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 Linux watchpoints: Couldn't write debug register: Invalid, argument.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878uor8ofr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A46706.8010601@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:53:26 +0100")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> I _still_ had to touch 3 different places with the same code... I'm
Pedro> very much looking forward to having all that merged.
Yeah. In the meantime perhaps copying the comments into all 3 copies
would make it simpler for the eventual merge. I noticed that the
comments are not in linux-x86-low.c or i386-linux-nat.c.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 1:10 [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix lost events, and handle multiple step-overs Pedro Alves
2014-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] Make signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp run against remote targets too Pedro Alves
2014-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] PR breakpoints/7143 - Watchpoint does not trigger when first set Pedro Alves
2014-03-16 3:41 ` Doug Evans
2014-03-17 17:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-19 16:52 ` Doug Evans
2014-03-20 13:58 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-20 13:57 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-17 19:18 ` Regression for watchpoint-fork.exp [Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PR breakpoints/7143 - Watchpoint does not trigger when first set] Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-18 10:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-19 13:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-19 15:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-19 16:56 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-19 17:00 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-20 16:53 ` [PATCH] x86 Linux watchpoints: Couldn't write debug register: Invalid, argument Pedro Alves
2014-06-20 17:45 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2014-06-20 17:52 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-20 17:53 ` Tom Tromey
2014-06-22 18:31 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-23 17:41 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-23 17:44 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Fix missing breakpoint/watchpoint hits, eliminate deferred_step_ptid Pedro Alves
2014-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] Handle multiple step-overs Pedro Alves
2014-03-07 1:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] Fix for even more missed events; eliminate thread-hop code Pedro Alves
2014-03-20 13:59 ` [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix lost events, and handle multiple step-overs Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878uor8ofr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox