Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: tom@tromey.com,  Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>,
	 gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Add configure support riscv*-linux*.
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 23:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878t5gjv94.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-434a3c5a-e632-4132-8fbf-bca82f51a81c@palmer-si-x1c4>	(Palmer Dabbelt's message of "Wed, 08 Aug 2018 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT)")

>>>>> "Palmer" == Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> writes:

Palmer> To enable this support in BFD we decided to put both the 32-bit and 64-bit 
Palmer> RISC-V targets in the list of 32-bit targets.  This allows toolchains 
Palmer> configured with the 32-bit tuples to generate code for the 64-bit targets, 
Palmer> which when coupled with multilib gives you a functioning setup.

Palmer> I'd like to keep this behavior in GDB if possible, so "riscv32-unknown-elf-gdb" 
Palmer> can debug rv64i-based targets.

My main concern is really whether --disable-64-bit-bfd still works.
I don't know if people still use this, but as long as it exists it seems
like it should continue to work.  If RISC-V works in this setup, then it
is totally fine by me for gdb to follow, assuming it works as well.

Maybe to really test it has to be a 32 bit build with
--disable-64-bit-bfd and --enable-targets=all.

Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-08 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-08  2:12 [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V Linux native port Jim Wilson
2018-08-08  2:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] RISC-V: Make riscv_isa_xlen a global function Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 12:42   ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 17:55     ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 19:18   ` Simon Marchi
2018-08-08  2:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] RISC-V: Add linux target support Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 14:41   ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 18:19     ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 18:35       ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09 20:40         ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08  2:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] RISC-V: Add software single step support Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 12:50   ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 17:55     ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08  2:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] RISC-V: Add native linux support Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 15:58   ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 23:36     ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 23:39       ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  8:42         ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-09 20:41           ` Jim Wilson
2018-10-25 10:49         ` Andreas Schwab
2018-10-25 11:09           ` Andrew Burgess
2018-10-25 12:06             ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-28 11:23               ` Andrew Burgess
2018-10-25 17:55             ` John Baldwin
2018-10-25 18:17               ` Jim Wilson
2018-10-25 19:19                 ` John Baldwin
2018-10-27  6:07                   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-10-29  8:50                 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-10-25 16:40           ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08  2:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Add configure support riscv*-linux* Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 16:00   ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 17:30   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-08 18:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-08 20:49     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-08 23:26       ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2018-08-08 23:29         ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-09  2:36         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-09  3:43           ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  4:55             ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-09  7:05             ` Andreas Schwab
2018-08-09 12:55             ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-09 17:25               ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  0:25     ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  0:29       ` [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Add configure support for riscv*-linux* Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  2:39         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-08-09 15:57         ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-09 20:42           ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V Linux native port Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 17:41   ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-08 18:16     ` Andrew Burgess
2018-08-08 18:42       ` Jim Wilson
2018-08-09  3:18         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-10 18:04 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878t5gjv94.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jimw@sifive.com \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox