From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] C++ify gdb/common/environ.c
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f08x84v.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0759537-8bd5-0fba-3ee2-ca325be0c89b@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:40:17 +0100")
On Monday, June 19 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 05:19 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>> I
>> think it also makes a lot more sense to always initialize the vector
>> with a NULL element, because this means we're correctly dealing with the
>> case where there's no environment variable to be passed to the inferior.
>
> This sentence confuses me, because I don't understand what you mean
> by "correctly" here. What was incorrect?
What I mean is that the internal state of the vector is correct from the
get-go. As you said in another message, the environment vector passed
to the exec* family of syscalls should contain at least one element,
NULL. This means we can make sure that the vector generated by the API
(via the envp method) obeys this rule, or that the internal vector
(m_environ_vector) obeys this rule. I prefer the second method, because
it leaves everything (internal and external) in a correct state.
I don't have any advanced C++ arguments to base my opinion on, and I am
well aware that this means preallocating things that maybe didn't need
to be allocated, but I still prefer keeping the NULL element there
because it makes more sense to me.
My half-cent to this discussion.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-13 4:05 [PATCH] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-04-15 18:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-04-15 21:22 ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 2:49 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-04-16 5:09 ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-16 17:32 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-04-18 3:03 ` [PATCH v3] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-04-19 4:56 ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-19 16:30 ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-19 18:14 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-01 2:22 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-05-04 15:30 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-14 19:22 ` [PATCH v4] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-16 15:45 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-16 18:01 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-16 18:23 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-16 21:59 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-16 22:23 ` [PATCH v5] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-17 8:54 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-19 4:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 13:40 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 16:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2017-06-19 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-20 14:02 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v6] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 4:51 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 7:18 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-19 14:26 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 15:30 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-19 15:44 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 15:47 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 16:26 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-19 16:55 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 17:59 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 18:09 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 18:23 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 18:36 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 18:38 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 14:26 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 16:13 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 16:38 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 16:46 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-19 18:27 ` [PATCH v7] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-20 3:27 ` [PATCH v8] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-06-20 12:13 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-20 12:46 ` Simon Marchi
2017-06-20 13:00 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f08x84v.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox