Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Updates on GDB 8.3.1 and GDB 9 releases (2019-07-14)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e7i3vpr.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f08a7376-90dc-8561-4e83-7f65b831fdd9@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's	message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:02:38 +0200")

On Tuesday, July 16 2019, Tom de Vries wrote:

> On 14-07-19 19:52, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>> 
>> It's been a couple months since we released 8.3 already. Our typical
>> schedule would be to try to create the corrective release ("re-spin")
>> in about a month from now. Given that...
>>   - So far, there is only been one fix pushed to the branch since
>>     the release; and
>>   - that a month from now is mid-Aug, which is holiday time for many;
>> ... I purpose we don't do anything until end of Aug...
>> 
>> Depending on when we'd like to have GDB 9 come out, we might even
>> want to skip 8.3.1 entirely? Personally, I don't mind spending the couple
>> of hours it takes to create a new release, even if it's for a couple
>> of patches. But perhaps there'll be more by then too.
>> 
>
> I ran a comparison of trunk and 8.3 branch for x86_64 -m32, and got:
> ...
> $ diff -u <(grep ^FAIL: 8.3.m32/gdb.sum| sort) <(grep ^FAIL:
> trunk.m32/gdb.sum|sort) | grep '^\-'
> --- /dev/fd/63  2019-07-16 12:00:21.372197815 +0200
> -FAIL: gdb.base/catch-load.exp: plain unload: continue
> -FAIL: gdb.base/catch-load.exp: rx unload: continue
> -FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: info sharedlibrary #7
> -FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: info sharedlibrary #8
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: without semaphore, not optimized: check
> $_probe_arg1 for probe m4
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: without semaphore, optimized: check
> $_probe_arg1 for probe m4
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: without semaphore, optimized: print
> $_probe_arg1 for probe ps
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: with semaphore, not optimized: check
> $_probe_arg1 for probe m4
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: with semaphore, optimized: check
> $_probe_arg1 for probe m4
> -FAIL: gdb.base/stap-probe.exp: with semaphore, optimized: print
> $_probe_arg1 for probe ps
> -FAIL: gdb.base/unload.exp: continuing to unloaded libfile
> -FAIL: gdb.base/unload.exp: continuing to unloaded libfile
> -FAIL: gdb.base/unload.exp: continuing to unloaded libfile2
> -FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp: test_pending_resolved: pending
> resolved: breakpoint on pendfunc3 pending again
> -FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp: test_pending_resolved: pending
> resolved: (timeout)
> -FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-catch-load.exp: catch-unload: solib-event stop
> ...
>
> The stap-probe.exp fix looks like 7d7571f0c1 "Adjust i386 registers on
> SystemTap probes' arguments (PR breakpoints/24541)".
>
> If bisected the base/info-shared.exp fix to the same commit (which I did
> not expect).

This is because GDB uses SystemTap probes behind the scenes to deal with
the linker-debugger interface.  I don't have the logs here, but I'd
guess there's something nasty going on because of the -m32 stap bug...

> So I wonder if this commit is a good candidate to backport.

I'd say so.  The commit is simple enough, hasn't caused any regressions
so far, and fixes a decent number of failures on -m32.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-14 17:52 Joel Brobecker
     [not found] ` <f08a7376-90dc-8561-4e83-7f65b831fdd9@suse.de>
2019-08-12 21:44   ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2019-08-21  9:11     ` [8.3 backport] Adjust i386 registers on SystemTap probes' arguments (PR breakpoints/24541) Tom de Vries
2019-09-04  8:19       ` [PING][8.3 " Tom de Vries
2019-09-04 16:43         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-09 20:53           ` Joel Brobecker
2019-09-11 20:11             ` Tom de Vries

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877e7i3vpr.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox