From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [committed][gdb/testsuite] Make skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests return 1 if true
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e6z273r.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ad919e6-44ff-d9e4-5530-92fb87e452d8@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:51:02 +0200")
On Monday, August 26 2019, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [PATCH][gdb, c++] Improve error message when using libstdcxx
> without SDT probes ]
>
> On 26-08-19 16:11, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>> +set libstdcxx_probe_tests_supported [skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests]
>> Not your fault, but this reversed logic (skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests
>> returns 0 if the tests should be skipped) is kinda confusing.
>>
>
> It's also confusing me.
>
> Fixed in attached patch.
Aha, thanks!
> Committed.
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
> [gdb/testsuite] Make skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests return 1 if true
>
> The tcl proc skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests currently returns 0 if the probe tests
> need to be skipped, while tcl interprets 0 as false rather than true, which is
> confusing.
>
> Fix this by making skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests return 1 if the probe tests need
> to be skipped.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-08-26 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
>
> * lib/gdb.exp (skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests_prompt): Return 1 if probe
> * tests need to be skipped.
> * gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp: Update call to skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests.
> * gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp: Update call to
> mi_skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests.
>
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp | 2 +-
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp | 2 +-
> gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 9 +++++----
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp
> index 46378d1b69..f6dcd0f5bd 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/exceptprint.exp
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ if {![runto_main]} {
> return -1
> }
>
> -if {![skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests]} {
> +if {[skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests]} {
> untested "could not find libstdc++ stap probe"
> return -1
> }
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp
> index 029dc1bd02..2951497882 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-catch-cpp-exceptions.exp
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ mi_gdb_load ${binfile}
> if {![mi_run_to_main]} {
> return -1
> }
> -set libstdcxx_probe_tests_supported [mi_skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests]
> +set libstdcxx_probe_tests_supported [expr ![mi_skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests]]
>
> # Grab some line numbers we'll need.
> set catch_1_lineno [gdb_get_line_number "Catch 1"]
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> index af56e8aa12..76805fb5ec 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> @@ -3158,20 +3158,21 @@ proc skip_unwinder_tests {} {
> return $ok
> }
>
> -# Return 0 if we should skip tests that require the libstdc++ stap
> +# Return 1 if we should skip tests that require the libstdc++ stap
> # probes. This must be invoked while gdb is running, after shared
> # libraries have been loaded. PROMPT_REGEXP is the expected prompt.
>
> proc skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests_prompt { prompt_regexp } {
> - set ok 0
> + set supported 0
> gdb_test_multiple "info probe" "check for stap probe in libstdc++" {
> -re ".*libstdcxx.*catch.*\r\n$prompt_regexp" {
> - set ok 1
> + set supported 1
> }
> -re "\r\n$prompt_regexp" {
> }
> } "$prompt_regexp"
> - return $ok
> + set skip [expr !$supported]
> + return $skip
> }
>
> # As skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests_prompt, with gdb_prompt.
>
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 21:04 [PATCH][gdb, c++] Improve error message when using libstdcxx without SDT probes Tom de Vries
2019-07-26 21:00 ` Tom Tromey
2019-08-13 13:51 ` [PING][PATCH][gdb, " Tom de Vries
2019-08-26 8:47 ` [PING^2][PATCH][gdb, " Tom de Vries
2019-08-26 14:11 ` [PATCH][gdb, " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-26 16:51 ` [committed][gdb/testsuite] Make skip_libstdcxx_probe_tests return 1 if true Tom de Vries
2019-08-26 17:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2019-08-26 17:27 ` [PATCH][gdb, c++] Improve error message when using libstdcxx without SDT probes Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877e6z273r.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox