Misplaced vCont paragraph in the middle of vFlashErase

Misplaced vCont paragraph in the middle of vFlashErase

[Thomas Schwinge]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1719 bytes --]

Hi!

It appears that in her 2008-09-22 commit, Sandra placed this vCont
paragraph in the wrong section, in the middle of vFlashErase -- and
apparently I'm the first one to read this text in more than three years?
;-)

gdb/doc/
2012-01-26  Thomas Schwinge  <thomas@codesourcery.com>

	* gdb.textinfo (Packets): Move vCont paragraph to the correct place.

diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
index fa728db..5738d14 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -34046,6 +34046,12 @@ the corresponding stop reply should indicate that the thread has stopped with
 signal @samp{0}, regardless of whether the target uses some other signal
 as an implementation detail.
 
+The stub must support @samp{vCont} if it reports support for
+multiprocess extensions (@pxref{multiprocess extensions}).  Note that in
+this case @samp{vCont} actions can be specified to apply to all threads
+in a process by using the @samp{p@var{pid}.-1} form of the
+@var{thread-id}.
+
 Reply:
 @xref{Stop Reply Packets}, for the reply specifications.
 
@@ -34078,12 +34084,6 @@ together, and sends a @samp{vFlashDone} request after each group; the
 stub is allowed to delay erase operation until the @samp{vFlashDone}
 packet is received.
 
-The stub must support @samp{vCont} if it reports support for
-multiprocess extensions (@pxref{multiprocess extensions}).  Note that in
-this case @samp{vCont} actions can be specified to apply to all threads
-in a process by using the @samp{p@var{pid}.-1} form of the
-@var{thread-id}.
-
 Reply:
 @table @samp
 @item OK

OK to commit?  (Someone please verify it's the most sensible place where
I put it.)


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]

Re: Misplaced vCont paragraph in the middle of vFlashErase

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:14:37 +0100
> 
> OK to commit?

Yes, and thanks for noticing this blunder.

> (Someone please verify it's the most sensible place where I put it.)

Verified.