Re: Update dg-extract-results.* from gcc

[Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>]

>>>>> "Rainer" == Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

Rainer> Therefore I propose to update both files from the gcc repo.  The changes
Rainer> to the .sh version are trivial, just counting the number of DejaGnu
Rainer> ERROR lines, too.

Thank you for doing this.  This is ok.

Rainer> * One could keep the files in toplevel contrib as in gcc, instead of
Rainer>   stashing them away in gdb/testsuite.

I don't have an opinion on this one, either way is ok by me.

Rainer> * One could also copy over gcc's contrib/test_summary, used by the
Rainer>   toplevel make mail-report.log to provide a nice summary of test
Rainer>   results.  However, this is currently hampered by the fact that for
Rainer>   parallel make check the gdb.sum and gdb.log files are left in
Rainer>   outputs/*/*/gdb.{sum,log} after dg-extract-results.sh has run instead
Rainer>   of moving them to *.sep like gcc's gcc/Makefile.in does, so
Rainer>   mail-report.log lists every failure twice.

I don't understand the "*.sep" comment - would you mind spelling it out?

Anyway, if this script is useful to you, it's fine with me if you want
to find a way to make it work.  I think the outputs/** stuff can be
moved around or messed with pretty freely, though of course it is best
not to outright lose things.

Tom