Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Fix check-psymtab failure for inline function
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:08:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kuv7nxk.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309145237.GA20334@delia> (Tom de Vries's message of "Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:52:39 +0100")

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes:

Tom> When loading the executable in gdb, we create a partial symbol for foo, but
Tom> after expansion into a full symbol table no actual symbol is created,
Tom> resulting in a maint check-psymtab failure:
Tom> ...
Tom> (gdb) maint check-psymtab
Tom> Static symbol `foo' only found in inline.c psymtab
Tom> ...

Tom> Fix this by preventing the creation of this type of partial symbol.

With this patch, if there is a function which is only inlined (there is
no "out-line" copy), will "break function" still work?

It seems to me that it wouldn't always, because there wouldn't be a
partial symbol to match.  Maybe it might work accidentally if the inline
function appears in a CU that is already expanded, like main's.  So the
test would have to be an always-inline function that isn't used in
main's CU.

If it does work, then I wonder how, since my mental model is that all
the paths to expansion require a matching partial symbol.

If it doesn't work, then I think a different fix is needed.

thanks,
Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-11  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-09 14:52 Tom de Vries
2020-03-11  0:08 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2020-03-18 13:48   ` [committed][gdb/testsuite] Add test-case gdb.dwarf2/break-inline-psymtab.exp Tom de Vries
2020-04-02 14:24     ` Pedro Alves
2020-04-02 15:14       ` Tom de Vries
2020-03-18 15:58   ` [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Fix check-psymtab failure for inline function Tom de Vries
2020-04-02  8:46     ` [PING][PATCH][gdb/symtab] " Tom de Vries
2020-04-06 20:40     ` [PATCH][gdb/symtab] " Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874kuv7nxk.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox