From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: pthread_cond_wait.exp: Avoid a race
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738x1nvej.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130212173855.GI17107@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:38:55 -0800")
Joel> OK, it will be fine, I suppose, especially if we can file-parallelize
Joel> the testsuite.
I have it working -- not in my totally ideal form, but I'm reaching
diminishing returns and also boredom. I need to look into some
remote-testing things, and also write up an RFC about changes to the
tests. I keep postponing this, mostly due to unrelated things, but I'll
get to it sooner rather than later.
Anyway, as part of this, I looked at test suite timings. I ran each
.exp file separately and looked at the elapsed time it took.
Some interesting bits:
octave:3> mean(Tdata)
ans = 1.1680
octave:4> min(Tdata)
ans = 0.070000
octave:5> max(Tdata)
ans = 80.780
octave:6> std(Tdata)
ans = 4.1273
So, most tests are quite fast, but we have some huge outliers. The 80
second one is break-interp.exp, but there are others, see appended.
Crunching the numbers, something I'm not totally confident I did
correctly, says that we can scale the test suite up to about -j12.
After that break-interp will start dominating the time.
Tom
All times further than 2 standard deviations from the mean:
octave> sort(Tdata(find(Tdata > mean(Tdata) + 2*std(Tdata))), 'descend')
ans =
80.7800
60.4900
40.2700
34.3500
22.0500
20.0000
19.8900
19.6500
19.3000
15.4500
14.7300
14.5400
13.5700
10.2300
9.9100
9.7000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-12 17:04 Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-12 17:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-12 17:30 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-12 17:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-12 20:13 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2013-02-14 15:25 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-12 17:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738x1nvej.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox