From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: pthread_cond_wait.exp: Avoid a race
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212172950.GA6877@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130212172301.GH17107@adacore.com>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:23:01 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > It is just too racy. I will check in the easy workaround below, it is
> > sure not a real fix.
>
> 2 seconds feels much much much too long, however.
2 seconds is a general delay standard in the testsuite so I do not find it
would hurt so much:
$ grep 'sleep 2' */*.exp|wc -l
20
> I try to avoid
> these types of delays, because collectively they make a significant
> dent on the overall amount of time it takes to run the testsuite.
The testsuite is already directory-parallelized and soon Tom should introduce
even a file-parallelization, so sleep should not hurt much.
> I am trying to think of a way to rewrite the program to avoid
> the delay entirely,
Yes, I understand the sleep is terribly but as it is so widespread in the
testsuite I just found it a "good enough" fix. Sure I can keep it only among
my local non-upstreamed testsuite races fixes so that I can continue running
the daily regression testing:
gdbserverasyncnonstop.patch
watchpointfork2.patch
gccpr4.patch
valgrind-kill.patch
> but I don't think it's possible,
IMO there should be retrying. If it does not find the symbol then resume it
for another 0.1 sec or even 1 sec as such case does not commonly happen.
> Can we try a smaller value?
No. IMO even those 2 seconds is too long. The machine has load about 20-30
when running the parallelized testsuites (I always run 3 at once) and I would
like to parallelize it even more if the testsuite already was not so fragily
gainst even higher loads.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-12 17:04 Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-12 17:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-12 17:30 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2013-02-12 17:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-02-12 20:13 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-14 15:25 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-12 17:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130212172950.GA6877@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox