Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_process_displaced_insn
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86oabnpk4r.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455121027-27061-2-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com>	(Simon Marchi's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:17:05 -0500")

Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> writes:

> -  if ((insn & 0xf0000000) == 0xf0000000)
> -    err = arm_decode_unconditional (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> -  else switch (((insn & 0x10) >> 4) | ((insn & 0xe000000) >> 24))
> +  cond = bits (insn, 28, 31);

Variable 'cond' is only used once, so don't need to define it.  This is
my personal flavour.

> +  op1 = bits (insn, 25, 27);
> +  op = bit (insn, 4);
> +
> +  if (cond != 0xf)

if (bits (insn, 28, 31) != INST_NV)

this is consistent with other places in arm-tdep.c

>      {
> -    case 0x0: case 0x1: case 0x2: case 0x3:
> -      err = arm_decode_dp_misc (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> -      break;
> +      switch (op1)
> +	{
> +	case 0x0:
> +	case 0x1:
> +	  /* Data-processing and miscellaneous instructions  */
> +	  err = arm_decode_dp_misc (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> +	  break;
>  
> -    case 0x4: case 0x5: case 0x6:
> -      err = arm_decode_ld_st_word_ubyte (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> -      break;
> +	case 0x2:
> +	  /* Load/store word and unsigned byte  */
> +	  err = arm_decode_ld_st_word_ubyte (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> +	  break;
>  
> -    case 0x7:
> -      err = arm_decode_media (gdbarch, insn, dsc);
> -      break;
> +	case 0x3:
> +	  if (op == 0)

'op' is only used here, let us define it in this block, or use
'bit (insn, 4)' instead.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-11 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-10 16:17 [PATCH 0/3] Minor refactorings in arm-tdep.c instruction decoding Simon Marchi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_process_displaced_insn Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:22   ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-02-11 16:59     ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-12 16:56       ` Yao Qi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_decode_dp_misc Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:52   ` Yao Qi
2016-02-11 17:10     ` Yao Qi
2016-02-11 17:18     ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_decode_media Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:58   ` Yao Qi
2016-02-11 11:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] Minor refactorings in arm-tdep.c instruction decoding Yao Qi
2016-02-16 15:26   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86oabnpk4r.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox