From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_decode_dp_misc
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86h9hfpipt.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455121027-27061-3-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> (Simon Marchi's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:17:06 -0500")
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com> writes:
> Refactor arm_decode_dp_misc to make it more readable. The new layout
> matches very closely the description in the ARM Architecture Reference
> Manual. It uses the same order and same nomenclature.
As I mentioned in the reply to the patch cover letter, the manual may
adjust the layout in the future. For example, the manual lists
instructions whose OP is 0 first, but it may change to list instructions
whose OP is 1 first in the future. IMO, we don't have to 100% match the
code to the manual.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * arm-tdep.c (arm_decode_dp_misc): Refactor instruction decoding.
> ---
> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> index 0a9c0f6..e17a1a4 100644
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -6517,45 +6517,70 @@ arm_decode_dp_misc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, uint32_t insn,
> struct regcache *regs,
> struct displaced_step_closure *dsc)
> {
> - if (bit (insn, 25))
> - switch (bits (insn, 20, 24))
> - {
> - case 0x10:
> - return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "movw", dsc);
> -
> - case 0x14:
> - return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "movt", dsc);
> + uint8_t op = bit (insn, 25);
> + uint8_t op1 = bits (insn, 20, 24);
> + uint8_t op2 = bits (insn, 4, 7);
>
> - case 0x12: case 0x16:
> - return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "msr imm", dsc);
> -
> - default:
> - return arm_copy_alu_imm (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> - }
> - else
> + if (op == 0)
> {
> - uint32_t op1 = bits (insn, 20, 24), op2 = bits (insn, 4, 7);
> -
> if ((op1 & 0x19) != 0x10 && (op2 & 0x1) == 0x0)
> + /* Data-processing (register) */
> return arm_copy_alu_reg (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> else if ((op1 & 0x19) != 0x10 && (op2 & 0x9) == 0x1)
> + /* Data-processing (register-shifted register) */
> return arm_copy_alu_shifted_reg (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> else if ((op1 & 0x19) == 0x10 && (op2 & 0x8) == 0x0)
> + /* Miscellaneous instructions */
> return arm_decode_miscellaneous (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> else if ((op1 & 0x19) == 0x10 && (op2 & 0x9) == 0x8)
> + /* Halfword multiply and multiply accumulate */
> return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "halfword mul/mla", dsc);
> else if ((op1 & 0x10) == 0x00 && op2 == 0x9)
> + /* Multiply and multiply accumulate */
> return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "mul/mla", dsc);
> else if ((op1 & 0x10) == 0x10 && op2 == 0x9)
> + /* Synchronization primitives */
> return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "synch", dsc);
These added comments are helpful.
> - else if (op2 == 0xb || (op2 & 0xd) == 0xd)
> - /* 2nd arg means "unprivileged". */
> - return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, (op1 & 0x12) == 0x02, regs,
> - dsc);
> + else if ((op1 & 0x12) != 0x2 && op2 == 0xb)
> + /* Extra load/store instructions */
> + return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, 0, regs, dsc);
> + else if ((op1 & 0x12) != 0x2 && (op2 & 0xd) == 0xd)
> + /* Extra load/store instructions */
> + return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, 0, regs, dsc);
> + else if ((op1 & 0x13) == 0x2 && (op2 & 0xd) == 0xd)
> + /* Extra load/store instructions */
> + return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, 0, regs, dsc);
> + else if ((op1 & 0x12) == 0x2 && op2 == 0xd)
> + /* Extra load/store instructions, unprivileged */
> + return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, 1, regs, dsc);
> + else if ((op1 & 0x13) == 0x3 && (op2 & 0xd) == 0xd)
> + /* Extra load/store instructions, unprivileged */
> + return arm_copy_extra_ld_st (gdbarch, insn, 1, regs, dsc);
> + else
> + return 1;
However, I don't see how helpful or useful the changes above are.
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + switch (op1)
> + {
> + default:
> + /* Data-processing (immediate) */
> + return arm_copy_alu_imm (gdbarch, insn, regs, dsc);
> +
> + case 0x10:
> + /* 16-bit immediate load, MOV (immediate) */
> + return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "movw", dsc);
> +
> + case 0x14:
> + /* High halfword 16-bit immediate load, MOVT */
> + return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "movt", dsc);
> +
> + case 0x12:
> + case 0x16:
> + /* MSR (immediate), and hints */
> + return arm_copy_unmodified (gdbarch, insn, "msr imm", dsc);
> + }
> }
> -
> - /* Should be unreachable. */
> - return 1;
> }
In short, I don't see how this patch improve the readability of the
code, and I feel hard mapping the code to the manual.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 16:17 [PATCH 0/3] Minor refactorings in arm-tdep.c instruction decoding Simon Marchi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_decode_media Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:58 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_process_displaced_insn Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-11 16:59 ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-12 16:56 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-10 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm-tdep.c: Refactor arm_decode_dp_misc Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:52 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-02-11 17:10 ` Yao Qi
2016-02-11 17:18 ` Simon Marchi
2016-02-11 11:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] Minor refactorings in arm-tdep.c instruction decoding Yao Qi
2016-02-16 15:26 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86h9hfpipt.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox