From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove MAX_REGISTER_SIZE from regcache.c
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86efx0ljsv.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F89B7D56-912C-4AF5-9770-F6EFF6DC25F4@arm.com> (Alan Hayward's message of "Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:10:09 +0000")
Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com> writes:
>>> @@ -395,9 +404,9 @@ regcache_restore (struct regcache *dst,
>>> {
>>> enum register_status status;
>>
>> Can we move "buf" here? and initialize it with the register_size,
>>
>> std::vector<gdb_byte> buf (register_size (gdbarch, regnum));
>>
>> then, we don't need max_register_size ().
>>
>
> Problem with this is that we are then creating a brand new buffer for each
> iteration of the loop, which is a little heavyweight.
> We could create an empty buf outside the loop and re-size it each iteration,
> but that's still going to cost.
>
How is this patch below? I class-fied regcache last month in my local
tree, and MAX_REGISTER_SIZE is disappeared from regcache.c. I suggested
using std::vector in a loop so that it is easy to rebase my patches.
--
Yao (齐尧)
From 25d562b5f858314ad9d41a7ffa825d8d24e3828e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 22:50:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Simplify regcache_restore
This patches removes the 2nd argument of regcache_restore, because it
is only called by regcache_cpy. In regcache_cpy, if regcache_restore
is called, dst is not readonly, but src is readonly. So this patch
adds an assert that src is readonly in regcache_restore.
regcache_cook_read read everything from a readonly regcache cache
(src)'s register_buffer, and register status is from src->register_status.
gdb:
2017-04-07 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* regcache.c (regcache_restore): Remove argument 2. Replace
argument 3 with regcache. Get register status from
src->register_status and get register contents from
register_buffer (src, regnum).
(regcache_cpy): Update.
diff --git a/gdb/regcache.c b/gdb/regcache.c
index 37bc2f0..41c23a5 100644
--- a/gdb/regcache.c
+++ b/gdb/regcache.c
@@ -374,17 +374,15 @@ regcache_save (struct regcache *dst, regcache_cooked_read_ftype *cooked_read,
}
static void
-regcache_restore (struct regcache *dst,
- regcache_cooked_read_ftype *cooked_read,
- void *cooked_read_context)
+regcache_restore (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
{
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = dst->descr->gdbarch;
- gdb_byte buf[MAX_REGISTER_SIZE];
int regnum;
/* The dst had better not be read-only. If it is, the `restore'
doesn't make much sense. */
gdb_assert (!dst->readonly_p);
+ gdb_assert (src->readonly_p);
/* Copy over any registers, being careful to only restore those that
were both saved and need to be restored. The full [0 .. gdbarch_num_regs
+ gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs) range is checked since some architectures need
@@ -393,11 +391,8 @@ regcache_restore (struct regcache *dst,
{
if (gdbarch_register_reggroup_p (gdbarch, regnum, restore_reggroup))
{
- enum register_status status;
-
- status = cooked_read (cooked_read_context, regnum, buf);
- if (status == REG_VALID)
- regcache_cooked_write (dst, regnum, buf);
+ if (src->register_status[regnum] == REG_VALID)
+ regcache_cooked_write (dst, regnum, register_buffer (src, regnum));
}
}
}
@@ -424,7 +419,7 @@ regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
if (!src->readonly_p)
regcache_save (dst, do_cooked_read, src);
else if (!dst->readonly_p)
- regcache_restore (dst, do_cooked_read, src);
+ regcache_restore (dst, src);
else
regcache_cpy_no_passthrough (dst, src);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-24 10:19 Alan Hayward
2017-03-23 14:45 ` Alan Hayward
2017-03-24 8:49 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-24 10:28 ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-05 14:53 ` Alan Hayward
[not found] ` <868tneq1xj.fsf@gmail.com>
2017-04-05 18:10 ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-10 8:59 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2017-04-10 10:53 ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-21 14:01 ` Yao Qi
2017-04-26 14:03 ` Alan Hayward
2017-04-27 9:43 ` Yao Qi
2017-04-27 9:52 ` Alan Hayward
2017-05-03 8:21 ` Yao Qi
2017-05-03 10:42 ` Alan Hayward
2017-06-07 8:49 ` Alan Hayward
2017-06-07 9:12 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86efx0ljsv.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox