From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Abhay Kandpal <abhay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@redhat.com,
cel@linux.ibm.com, abhay.k@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gdbserver: widen the stat fields returned by the vFile packets
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 19:00:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8633vq495w.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903140555.1181769-1-abhay@linux.ibm.com> (message from Abhay Kandpal on Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:05:55 -0500)
> From: Abhay Kandpal <abhay@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, cel@linux.ibm.com, abhay.k@ibm.com,
> Abhay Kandpal <abhay@linux.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:05:55 -0500
>
>
> gdb/
> * NEWS: Mention the stat64 feature.
> * doc/gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document the stat64
> feature.
> (Host I/O Packets): Mention the wide reply format.
> (struct stat64): New node.
> * remote-fileio.c (remote_fileio_to_host_ulong8): New function.
> (remote_fileio_wide_to_host_stat): New function.
> * remote-fileio.h (remote_fileio_wide_to_host_stat): Declare.
> * remote.c (PACKET_stat64_feature): New enum value.
> (remote_features::stat64_feature): New method.
> (remote_protocol_features): Add stat64.
> (remote_target::remote_query_supported): Send stat64+.
> (fileio_process_fstat_and_lstat_reply): Handle both formats.
> (INIT_GDB_FILE): Add the stat64-feature packet command.
> * testsuite/gdb.server/fileio-packets.py (decode_stat_reply):
> Handle both the narrow and wide reply formats.
>
> gdbserver/
> * hostio.cc (handle_fstat, handle_stat, handle_lstat): Send the
> wide struct when the feature is negotiated.
> * server.cc (handle_query): Handle and report stat64.
> * server.h (client_state::stat64_feature): New member.
>
> gdbsupport/
> * fileio.cc (host_to_fileio_stat_wide): New function.
> (narrow_field, fileio_stat_wide_to_narrow): New functions.
> * fileio.h (struct fio_stat_wide): New struct.
> (bigendian_to_host): New function.
> (host_to_fileio_stat_wide, fileio_stat_wide_to_narrow): Declare.
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
> ---
> This patch is reg tested.
>
> gdb/NEWS | 12 +++
> gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 49 ++++++++++
> gdb/remote-fileio.c | 35 ++++++-
> gdb/remote-fileio.h | 4 +
> gdb/remote.c | 36 +++++--
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/fileio-packets.py | 59 +++++++-----
> gdbserver/hostio.cc | 106 +++++++++++++++------
> gdbserver/server.cc | 4 +-
> gdbserver/server.h | 5 +
> gdbsupport/fileio.cc | 70 ++++++++++++++
> gdbsupport/fileio.h | 54 ++++++++++-
> 11 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index 222f38e3d52..de8346350ab 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -3,6 +3,18 @@
>
> *** Changes since GDB 18
>
> +* Changed remote packets
> +
> +stat64 in qSupported
> +
> + The new stat64 feature within the qSupported packet allows GDB and
> + the stub to agree on a wider form of the stat structure returned by
> + the vFile:fstat, vFile:stat and vFile:lstat packets, in which st_dev,
> + st_ino, st_nlink, st_rdev and the three timestamps are 8 bytes rather
> + than 4. The wider form is used only when both sides report the
> + feature; otherwise the existing format is used and values which do
> + not fit are truncated as before.
This is okay, but does it mean that 32-bit timestamps mean that
version will die after 2038? If so, perhaps this should be mentioned
in the NEWS entry?
> +@item stat64
> +The remote stub supports the wider form of the stat structure returned
> +by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
> +packets, as described in @ref{struct stat64}.
The "as described in @ref..." paradigm produces nice HTML, but looks
awkward in Info, because it produces "see". I suggest a more
traditional
...by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
packets (@pxref{stat64}).
> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
Same here.
> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
And here.
> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
And here.
> +When the @samp{stat64} feature has been negotiated, the buffer returned
> +by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
> +packets uses the following representation instead:
> +
> +@smallexample
> +struct stat64 @{
> + unsigned long st_dev; /* device */
> + unsigned long st_ino; /* inode */
> + mode_t st_mode; /* protection */
> + unsigned long st_nlink; /* number of hard links */
> + unsigned int st_uid; /* user ID of owner */
> + unsigned int st_gid; /* group ID of owner */
> + unsigned long st_rdev; /* device type (if inode device) */
> + unsigned long st_size; /* total size, in bytes */
> + unsigned long st_blksize; /* blocksize for filesystem I/O */
> + unsigned long st_blocks; /* number of blocks allocated */
> + unsigned long st_atime; /* time of last access */
> + unsigned long st_mtime; /* time of last modification */
> + unsigned long st_ctime; /* time of last change */
> +@};
> +@end smallexample
You probably assumed that 'unsigned long' is a 64-bit type. But that
is not always true, so I suggest to use a more explicit uint64_t type
instead.
> +This structure is of size 92 bytes. The fields have the same meanings
> +as in @ref{struct stat}, but @code{st_dev}, @code{st_ino},
The "in @ref..." issue again.
> +This representation is only used by the @samp{vFile} packets; the
> +File-I/O protocol always uses @ref{struct stat}.
And here.
Thanks.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 14:05 Abhay Kandpal
2026-09-03 16:00 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2026-09-04 6:22 ` Abhay Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8633vq495w.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=abhay.k@ibm.com \
--cc=abhay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=cel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox