From: Abhay Kandpal <abhay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@redhat.com,
cel@linux.ibm.com, abhay.k@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gdbserver: widen the stat fields returned by the vFile packets
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 11:52:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84e01be2-82cd-4007-86e2-4b4462ecb66c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8633vq495w.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6673 bytes --]
Hi Eli,
On 03/09/26 21:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Abhay Kandpal<abhay@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc:aburgess@redhat.com,cel@linux.ibm.com,abhay.k@ibm.com,
>> Abhay Kandpal<abhay@linux.ibm.com>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 09:05:55 -0500
>>
>>
>> gdb/
>> * NEWS: Mention the stat64 feature.
>> * doc/gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document the stat64
>> feature.
>> (Host I/O Packets): Mention the wide reply format.
>> (struct stat64): New node.
>> * remote-fileio.c (remote_fileio_to_host_ulong8): New function.
>> (remote_fileio_wide_to_host_stat): New function.
>> * remote-fileio.h (remote_fileio_wide_to_host_stat): Declare.
>> * remote.c (PACKET_stat64_feature): New enum value.
>> (remote_features::stat64_feature): New method.
>> (remote_protocol_features): Add stat64.
>> (remote_target::remote_query_supported): Send stat64+.
>> (fileio_process_fstat_and_lstat_reply): Handle both formats.
>> (INIT_GDB_FILE): Add the stat64-feature packet command.
>> * testsuite/gdb.server/fileio-packets.py (decode_stat_reply):
>> Handle both the narrow and wide reply formats.
>>
>> gdbserver/
>> * hostio.cc (handle_fstat, handle_stat, handle_lstat): Send the
>> wide struct when the feature is negotiated.
>> * server.cc (handle_query): Handle and report stat64.
>> * server.h (client_state::stat64_feature): New member.
>>
>> gdbsupport/
>> * fileio.cc (host_to_fileio_stat_wide): New function.
>> (narrow_field, fileio_stat_wide_to_narrow): New functions.
>> * fileio.h (struct fio_stat_wide): New struct.
>> (bigendian_to_host): New function.
>> (host_to_fileio_stat_wide, fileio_stat_wide_to_narrow): Declare.
>>
>> Bug:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34567
>> ---
>> This patch is reg tested.
>>
>> gdb/NEWS | 12 +++
>> gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 49 ++++++++++
>> gdb/remote-fileio.c | 35 ++++++-
>> gdb/remote-fileio.h | 4 +
>> gdb/remote.c | 36 +++++--
>> gdb/testsuite/gdb.server/fileio-packets.py | 59 +++++++-----
>> gdbserver/hostio.cc | 106 +++++++++++++++------
>> gdbserver/server.cc | 4 +-
>> gdbserver/server.h | 5 +
>> gdbsupport/fileio.cc | 70 ++++++++++++++
>> gdbsupport/fileio.h | 54 ++++++++++-
>> 11 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
>> index 222f38e3d52..de8346350ab 100644
>> --- a/gdb/NEWS
>> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
>> @@ -3,6 +3,18 @@
>>
>> *** Changes since GDB 18
>>
>> +* Changed remote packets
>> +
>> +stat64 in qSupported
>> +
>> + The new stat64 feature within the qSupported packet allows GDB and
>> + the stub to agree on a wider form of the stat structure returned by
>> + the vFile:fstat, vFile:stat and vFile:lstat packets, in which st_dev,
>> + st_ino, st_nlink, st_rdev and the three timestamps are 8 bytes rather
>> + than 4. The wider form is used only when both sides report the
>> + feature; otherwise the existing format is used and values which do
>> + not fit are truncated as before.
> This is okay, but does it mean that 32-bit timestamps mean that
> version will die after 2038? If so, perhaps this should be mentioned
> in the NEWS entry?
It's 2106 rather than 2038. The narrow field is read as unsigned:
remote_fileio_to_host_time calls remote_fileio_to_host_uint, which uses
extract_unsigned_integer, so the range is 0 to 4294967295 seconds from
the epoch. I'll mention this in the NEWS entry.
>
>> +@item stat64
>> +The remote stub supports the wider form of the stat structure returned
>> +by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
>> +packets, as described in @ref{struct stat64}.
> The "as described in @ref..." paradigm produces nice HTML, but looks
> awkward in Info, because it produces "see". I suggest a more
> traditional
>
> ...by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
> packets (@pxref{stat64}).
Will fix, here and at the other five places. My node is named
"struct stat64" (to match the existing "struct stat" node), so I'll use
@pxref{struct stat64} — let me know if you'd prefer the node renamed.
>
>> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
>> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
>> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
> Same here.
>
>> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
>> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
>> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
> And here.
>
>> +If both @value{GDBN} and the stub report the @samp{stat64} feature in
>> +the @samp{qSupported} exchange, the wider format described in
>> +@ref{struct stat64} is used instead.
> And here.
>
>> +When the @samp{stat64} feature has been negotiated, the buffer returned
>> +by the @samp{vFile:fstat}, @samp{vFile:stat} and @samp{vFile:lstat}
>> +packets uses the following representation instead:
>> +
>> +@smallexample
>> +struct stat64 @{
>> + unsigned long st_dev; /* device */
>> + unsigned long st_ino; /* inode */
>> + mode_t st_mode; /* protection */
>> + unsigned long st_nlink; /* number of hard links */
>> + unsigned int st_uid; /* user ID of owner */
>> + unsigned int st_gid; /* group ID of owner */
>> + unsigned long st_rdev; /* device type (if inode device) */
>> + unsigned long st_size; /* total size, in bytes */
>> + unsigned long st_blksize; /* blocksize for filesystem I/O */
>> + unsigned long st_blocks; /* number of blocks allocated */
>> + unsigned long st_atime; /* time of last access */
>> + unsigned long st_mtime; /* time of last modification */
>> + unsigned long st_ctime; /* time of last change */
>> +@};
>> +@end smallexample
> You probably assumed that 'unsigned long' is a 64-bit type. But that
> is not always true, so I suggest to use a more explicit uint64_t type
> instead.
Good catch - I'd copied the types from the existing struct stat
documentation without thinking about it. Will use uint64_t.
Thanks for the review. I'll send a v2 soon.
Abhay
>
>> +This structure is of size 92 bytes. The fields have the same meanings
>> +as in @ref{struct stat}, but @code{st_dev}, @code{st_ino},
> The "in @ref..." issue again.
>
>> +This representation is only used by the @samp{vFile} packets; the
>> +File-I/O protocol always uses @ref{struct stat}.
> And here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii<eliz@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8909 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 14:05 Abhay Kandpal
2026-09-03 16:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2026-09-04 6:22 ` Abhay Kandpal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84e01be2-82cd-4007-86e2-4b4462ecb66c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=abhay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=abhay.k@ibm.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=cel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox