From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64 multi-arch part 6: HW breakpoint on unaligned address
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861tcy6b84.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561CE5D2.8030505@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:06:58 +0100")
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>> + {
>> + if (len == 3)
>> + len = 2;
>
> I think this warrants a comment. E.g., someone reading
> arm-linux-low.c:arm_linux_hw_point_initialize quite easily grasps
> what 3 means.
>
How about the comment like this?
if (len == 3)
{
/* LEN is 3 means the breakpoint is set on a 32-bit thumb
instruction. Set it to 2 to correctly encode length bit
mask in hardware/watchpoint control register. */
len = 2;
}
>> diff --git a/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c b/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
>> index bca6ec1..d15e518 100644
>> --- a/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
>> +++ b/gdb/nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c
>> @@ -112,8 +112,17 @@ aarch64_point_encode_ctrl_reg (enum target_hw_bp_type type, int len)
>> static int
>> aarch64_point_is_aligned (int is_watchpoint, CORE_ADDR addr, int len)
>> {
>> - unsigned int alignment = is_watchpoint ? AARCH64_HWP_ALIGNMENT
>> - : AARCH64_HBP_ALIGNMENT;
>> + unsigned int alignment = 0;
>> +
>> + if (is_watchpoint)
>> + alignment = AARCH64_HWP_ALIGNMENT;
>> + else
>> + {
>> + /* Set alignment to 2 only if the current process is 32-bit,
>> + since thumb instruction can be 2-byte aligned. Otherwise, set
>> + alignment to AARCH64_HBP_ALIGNMENT. */
>> + alignment = 2;
>
> Is some other code doing what the comment says? I'm not seeing
> any obvious 32-bit check.
No, I don't do the 32-bit check here. Ideally, we should set alignment
to 2 only when the process is 32-bit, and still use 4 as alignment
otherwise. However, I don't find an easy way to do the 32-bit check
here, because this code is used by both GDB and GDBserver. We can do
the 32-bit check in GDB and GDBserver respectively, and pass the result
to nat/aarch64-linux-hw-point.c, but I don't like putting information down
multiple levels like this.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-13 10:11 Yao Qi
2015-10-13 11:07 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-13 15:26 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2015-10-13 16:58 ` Andrew Pinski
2015-10-13 17:31 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-15 8:14 ` Yao Qi
2015-10-15 13:02 ` Pedro Alves
2015-10-15 14:10 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=861tcy6b84.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox