From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [8.3 backport] Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8484cf89-f276-4bed-3fa6-00a21b81ca61@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190517201814.27951-1-tromey@adacore.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1295 bytes --]
On 17-05-19 22:18, Tom Tromey wrote:
> From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>
> PR c++/20020 concerns a crash in cp_print_value_fields. The immediate
> cause is that cp_print_value_fields does not handle the case where
> value_static_field fails. This is fixed in this patch by calling
> cp_print_static_field from the "try" block.
>
> Digging a bit deeper, the error occurs because GCC does not emit a
> DW_AT_const_value for a static constexpr member appearing in a
> template class. I've filed a GCC bug for this.
>
> Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2019-05-17 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
>
> PR c++/20020:
> * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
> cp_print_static_field inside "try".
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2019-05-17 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
>
> PR c++/20020:
> * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
> * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
OK to backport to 8.3, as well as the followup patch "Fix two buglets in
cp_print_value_fields patch"?
Neither of the patches apply cleanly, so I'm attaching them here.
The difference in test results is:
...
+Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp ...
+XFAIL: gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: print x (PRMS gcc/90526)
+PASS: gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: print y
...
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Fix-crash-in-cp_print_value_fields.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5553 bytes --]
Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields
[ Backport of master commit 4330d61dfb. ]
PR c++/20020 concerns a crash in cp_print_value_fields. The immediate
cause is that cp_print_value_fields does not handle the case where
value_static_field fails. This is fixed in this patch by calling
cp_print_static_field from the "try" block.
Digging a bit deeper, the error occurs because GCC does not emit a
DW_AT_const_value for a static constexpr member appearing in a
template class. I've filed a GCC bug for this.
Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
* cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
cp_print_static_field inside "try".
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/cp-valprint.c | 13 +++++------
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index ee958c3f6e..f15cc5fcf0 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ PR c++/20020:
+ * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields): Call
+ cp_print_static_field inside "try".
+
2019-06-10 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR symtab/24545
diff --git a/gdb/cp-valprint.c b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
index 7124da42ec..8feaae03aa 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
@@ -314,13 +314,14 @@ cp_print_value_fields (struct type *type, struct type *real_type,
}
else if (field_is_static (&TYPE_FIELD (type, i)))
{
- struct value *v = NULL;
-
TRY
{
- v = value_static_field (type, i);
- }
+ struct value *v = value_static_field (type, i);
+ cp_print_static_field (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (type, i),
+ v, stream, recurse + 1,
+ options);
+ }
CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
fprintf_filtered (stream,
@@ -328,10 +329,6 @@ cp_print_value_fields (struct type *type, struct type *real_type,
ex.message);
}
END_CATCH
-
- cp_print_static_field (TYPE_FIELD_TYPE (type, i),
- v, stream, recurse + 1,
- options);
}
else if (i == vptr_fieldno && type == vptr_basetype)
{
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index ea1f78cc4b..5f26daa67e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ PR c++/20020:
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: New file.
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc: New file.
+
2019-04-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/24470:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ac2e514cb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+template<typename T>
+struct X
+{
+ static constexpr bool f = true;
+};
+
+X<int> x;
+
+struct Y
+{
+ static constexpr bool f = true;
+};
+
+Y y;
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e4849efeae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Copyright 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
+
+if {[skip_cplus_tests]} { continue }
+
+standard_testfile .cc
+
+if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile \
+ {c++ debug additional_flags=-std=c++17}]} {
+ return -1
+}
+
+if {![runto_main]} {
+ perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
+ continue
+}
+
+# "x" sometimes isn't available due to
+# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
+gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = .*}"
+
+gdb_test "print y" " = {static f = true}"
[-- Attachment #3: 0002-Fix-buglet-in-cp_print_value_fields-patch.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1374 bytes --]
Fix buglet in cp_print_value_fields patch
[ Backport of master commit 3d507ff23b. ]
Pedro pointed out an issue in the cp_print_value_fields
patch, aka the fix for PR c++/20020.
This patch addresses the issue. Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-06-27 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: Use setup_xfail.
---
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 5f26daa67e..c51036165c 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2019-06-27 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
+
+ * gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp: Use setup_xfail.
+
2019-05-29 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
PR c++/20020:
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
index e4849efeae..2f71cef952 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/constexpr-field.exp
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ if {![runto_main]} {
# "x" sometimes isn't available due to
# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90526
-gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = .*}"
+setup_xfail *-*-* gcc/90526
+gdb_test "print x" " = {static f = true}"
gdb_test "print y" " = {static f = true}"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-17 20:18 [PATCH] " Tom Tromey
2019-05-29 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2019-05-29 19:20 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-18 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-18 13:50 ` Tom de Vries
2019-06-18 15:35 ` Tom Tromey
2019-08-02 15:14 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2019-08-02 17:27 ` [8.3 backport] " Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8484cf89-f276-4bed-3fa6-00a21b81ca61@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox