From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "ILG.Robert" <R.ILG@bachmann.info>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Extending RSP with vCont;n and vCont;f
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y56bd4is.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7E3A266F5548C442BC08FA3038B5197C68449231@ATFKEX06.bachmann.at>
> From: "ILG.Robert" <R.ILG@bachmann.info>
> Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:08:02 +0000
>
> we would like to improve the RSP command "vCont" for remote debugging. It seems that the range option has been introduced recently to get rid of time consuming, successive single-steps. Our intention is to get rid of further, unnecessary RSP packages being sent as our target is capable to do a step-over (called next by GDB) and a step-return (called finish by GDB). Therefore we propose to extend the vCont command with "vCont;n" and "vCont;f" as well.
Thanks.
> +Â add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("finish-stepping", class_run,
> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â &use_finish_stepping, _("\
> +Â Enable or disable finish stepping."), _("\
> +Â Show whether target-assisted finish stepping is enabled."), _("\
> +Â If on, and the target supports it, when stepping out of a function, GDB\n\
> +Â tells the target to step out of the corresponding stack frame itself.\n\
> +Â This speeds up source level stepping. If off, GDB issues slower\n\
^^
Two spaces between sentences, please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 15:08 ILG.Robert
2013-10-02 16:25 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-10-04 6:49 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-03 5:04 ILG.Robert
2013-10-04 12:53 ILG.Robert
2013-10-06 7:58 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-07 12:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-23 7:19 ILG.Robert
2013-11-08 8:18 ILG.Robert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83y56bd4is.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=R.ILG@bachmann.info \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox