From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23727 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2013 16:25:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23718 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2013 16:25:03 -0000 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:25:03 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MU100F00UO3MW00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:25:00 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MU100F7SUXN2VC0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:25:00 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 16:25:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Extending RSP with vCont;n and vCont;f In-reply-to: <7E3A266F5548C442BC08FA3038B5197C68449231@ATFKEX06.bachmann.at> To: "ILG.Robert" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y56bd4is.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <7E3A266F5548C442BC08FA3038B5197C68449231@ATFKEX06.bachmann.at> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 > From: "ILG.Robert" > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:08:02 +0000 > > we would like to improve the RSP command "vCont" for remote debugging. It seems that the range option has been introduced recently to get rid of time consuming, successive single-steps. Our intention is to get rid of further, unnecessary RSP packages being sent as our target is capable to do a step-over (called next by GDB) and a step-return (called finish by GDB). Therefore we propose to extend the vCont command with "vCont;n" and "vCont;f" as well. Thanks. > +  add_setshow_boolean_cmd ("finish-stepping", class_run, > +                 &use_finish_stepping, _("\ > +  Enable or disable finish stepping."), _("\ > +  Show whether target-assisted finish stepping is enabled."), _("\ > +  If on, and the target supports it, when stepping out of a function, GDB\n\ > +  tells the target to step out of the corresponding stack frame itself.\n\ > +  This speeds up source level stepping. If off, GDB issues slower\n\ ^^ Two spaces between sentences, please.