Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Demangle minimal symbol names in worker threads
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83tvgb7we9.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190309172300.2764-1-tom@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey	on Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:22:54 -0700)

> From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
> Date: Sat,  9 Mar 2019 10:22:54 -0700
> 
> I've thought for a while that gdb should take advantage of multiple
> cores in order to speed up its processing.  This series is some
> initial work in that direction.
> 
> In particular, this patch arranges to do the demangling for minimal
> symbols in worker threads.  I chose this because it seemed relatively
> simple to reason about, as the demangler is already mostly thread-safe
> (except, as it turns out, the Ada demangler, which is fixed in this
> series).  It isn't actually a very important thing to speed up, as
> minimal symbol reading is already reasonably speedy; but I thought it
> best to start with something straightforward to facilitate flushing
> out thread safety bugs.

Thanks, but is std::thread portable enough?  E.g., I recall problems
with it in MinGW.

Same question regarding delivering signals to threads.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-09 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-09 17:23 Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 4/6] Introduce run_on_main_thread Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 1/6] Defer minimal symbol name-setting Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 5/6] Introduce thread-safe way to handle SIGSEGV Tom Tromey
2019-03-11 17:24   ` John Baldwin
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 2/6] Remove static buffer from ada_decode Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 6/6] Demangle minsyms in parallel Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 17:23 ` [RFC 3/6] Lock the demangled hash table Tom Tromey
2019-03-09 18:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-03-11 17:35   ` [RFC 0/6] Demangle minimal symbol names in worker threads John Baldwin
2019-03-11 22:39   ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-12  3:33     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-03-13 15:38       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-03-15 23:28         ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-16  7:46           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-03-16  8:31             ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-03-15 23:40         ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-16  7:52           ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-03-11 17:26 ` John Baldwin
2019-03-11 22:40   ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83tvgb7we9.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox