From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83pqi4y85c.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010184726.GA14706@host1.jankratochvil.net>
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:47:26 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
> eliz@gnu.org
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:00 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > The "doesn't justify the extra maintenance burden" is always a valid
> > excuse. But if you and Eli think it justifies it, go for it.
>
> Attached. In info document it looks the same, in PDF it looks very similar.
Fine with me, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 19:50 [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-09 19:27 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-09 20:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 13:40 ` doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames) Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-10 13:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 13:58 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-10-10 14:58 ` [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)] Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 15:16 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-10 15:31 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 15:51 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-10 18:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 19:11 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-10-10 21:56 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-10 22:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-10-11 23:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-12 15:26 ` Pedro Alves
2011-10-12 15:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-25 14:35 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-25 14:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-25 16:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-10-10 16:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-10 16:15 ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-10-10 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83pqi4y85c.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox