From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32646 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2011 19:11:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 32637 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2011 19:11:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:10:59 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSV007006GDQT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:10:58 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.91.138]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSV007K46M5PX10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:10:55 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:11:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)] In-reply-to: <20111010184726.GA14706@host1.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83pqi4y85c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201110101615.39047.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111010153049.GA11463@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110101651.00816.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111010184726.GA14706@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:47:26 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand , > eliz@gnu.org > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:00 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > > The "doesn't justify the extra maintenance burden" is always a valid > > excuse. But if you and Eli think it justifies it, go for it. > > Attached. In info document it looks the same, in PDF it looks very similar. Fine with me, thanks.