Re: GDB 8.1.90 available for testing

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
> Cc: brobecker@adacore.com,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:42:59 -0600
> 
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> CXX    symfile.o
> >> symfile.c: In function 'void set_objfile_default_section_offset(objfile*, const section_addr_info&, CORE_ADDR)':
> >> symfile.c:2114:14: warning: types may not be defined in a for-range-declaration
> >> for (const struct other_sections *objf_sect : objf_addrs_sorted)
> >> ^~~~~~
> >> 
> >> The first two I saw in GDB 8.1 and reported back in January.  I
> >> believe the conclusion was that we disregard these warnings?
> >> 
> >> But what about the 3rd one?
> 
> I think this is a gcc bug.  This looks related:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
> 
> Simon occasionally fixes these by removing the 'struct' keyword.
> This seems fine since it isn't really inconvenient and people may be
> using the buggy versions of gcc.
> 
> This particular spot was fixed on git master in revision ff27d0737ef0.
> I think it would be fine to cherry-pick that to the branch.

Thanks, I've now cherry-picked that commit to the 8.2 branch.