Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb/doc/python.texi: documented gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_LABEL. Added notion on possible exception thrown from symbol object .value() method

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Maxim Bublis <satori@yandex-team.ru>
> Cc: Maxim Bublis <satori@yandex-team.ru>
> Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2014 14:36:00 +0400
> 
> +2014-03-04  Maxim Bublis  <satori@yandex-team.ru>
> +
> +	* gdb/doc/python.texi (Symbols In Python): Document gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_LABEL
> +	address class. Added notion on possible exception thrown from .value()
                     ^^
Two spaces between sentences, please.  Also, please don't attach "()"
to function and method name to signal they are function, that's
against GNU Coding Standards (it looks like a call to a function with
no arguments, which is not what you want to say).

> --- a/gdb/doc/python.texi
> +++ b/gdb/doc/python.texi
> @@ -3544,7 +3544,10 @@ functions, this computes the address of the function, cast to the
>  appropriate type.  If the symbol requires a frame in order to compute
>  its value, then @var{frame} must be given.  If @var{frame} is not
>  given, or if @var{frame} is invalid, then this method will throw an
> -exception.
> +exception. For symbols with some address classes it is not possible
> +to compute value (eg. @code{gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_TYPEDEF} or
> +@code{gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_LABEL}), in this case exception will
> +be thrown.

Please try to minimize the use of passive tense, it makes the text
longer and slightly less clear.  In this case, I suggest to rephrase:

  This method will also throw an exception for symbols for which it is
  not possible to compute the value, such as
  @code{gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_TYPEDEF} or @code{gdb.SYMBOL_LOC_LABEL}.

The documentation patch is OK with those changes.

I have a question regarding the last part: is it wise to throw an
exception when a symbol has no value? how about returning None
instead?