* Updating Readline @ 2016-02-16 16:41 Eli Zaretskii 2016-02-16 17:24 ` Patrick Palka 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-02-16 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches This attempt to update Readline in GDB: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00422.html ended up not doing it. We are still at Readline 6.2, AFAICT. Is there any hope of updating to a newer Readline? Please? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Updating Readline 2016-02-16 16:41 Updating Readline Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-02-16 17:24 ` Patrick Palka 2016-02-16 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Patrick Palka @ 2016-02-16 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gdb-patches On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote: > This attempt to update Readline in GDB: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00422.html > > ended up not doing it. We are still at Readline 6.2, AFAICT. > > Is there any hope of updating to a newer Readline? Please? Updating to readline 7.0 (alpha) causes a lot of testsuite regressions on a number of (non-x86) platforms. It may be safer to first upgrade to readline 6.3 but in that case there are some local patches that have to be preserved. So it raises the question of how the ChangeLog should reflect that some local patches are preserved across the upgrade, while other local patches are dropped since they've been applied upstream. The idea is to make it easy to tell which local patches are currently applied against our upstream copy of readline especially across upgrades. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Updating Readline 2016-02-16 17:24 ` Patrick Palka @ 2016-02-16 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-02-16 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patrick Palka; +Cc: gdb-patches > From: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:23:24 -0500 > Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote: > > This attempt to update Readline in GDB: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-07/msg00422.html > > > > ended up not doing it. We are still at Readline 6.2, AFAICT. > > > > Is there any hope of updating to a newer Readline? Please? > > Updating to readline 7.0 (alpha) causes a lot of testsuite regressions > on a number of (non-x86) platforms. Yes, I know. That old thread says that, and it was the reason the upgrade never happened back then. > It may be safer to first upgrade to readline 6.3 Does it make sense to upgrade to 6.3 when 7.0 is already in beta? We do want eventually start using a newer Readline, I hope. If so, we need to start fixing the problems the update causes, otherwise we will be left behind. Either our tests need to be amended or Readline 7.0 is not a simple drop-in replacement, and more of our code needs to be changed. But I don't think it makes sense to do nothing, or start using an old version of Readline. We will be just deferring the problem for later, and it won't fix itself, I think. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-16 18:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-02-16 16:41 Updating Readline Eli Zaretskii 2016-02-16 17:24 ` Patrick Palka 2016-02-16 18:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox