From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
Cc: philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: NEWS entry for Changes to the "frame", "select-frame" ...
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 15:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <831s5p24bz.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190106104636.GQ3456@embecosm.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Sun, 6 Jan 2019 10:46:36 +0000)
> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 10:46:36 +0000
> From: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> * Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> [2019-01-04 21:34:31 +0100]:
>
> > The below paragraph is at an unusual place in NEWS,
> > as new and changed commands are normally documented in the sections
> > * New commands
> > or
> > * Changed commands.
> >
> > Maybe it should be reworded and moved to these 2 sections ?
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> > * Changes to the "frame", "select-frame", and "info frame" CLI
> >  commands.  These commands all now take a frame specification which
> > Â is either a frame level, or one of the keywords 'level', 'address',
> >  'function', or 'view' followed by a parameter.  Selecting a frame by
> > Â address, or viewing a frame outside the current backtrace now
> >  requires the use of a keyword.  Selecting a frame by level is
> >  unchanged.  The MI comment "-stack-select-frame" is unchanged.
>
> This is fine with me (as the original author), but you'll need a
> maintainer to OK the change too.
I'm OK with moving this to the "Changed commands" section.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-06 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-04 20:34 Philippe Waroquiers
2019-01-06 10:46 ` Andrew Burgess
2019-01-06 15:28 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-01-09 21:41 ` Philippe Waroquiers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=831s5p24bz.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox