From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: ac131313@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Doco problems with level two annotations
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 08:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8011-Sat17May2003112039+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EC57FE4.1000704@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 16 May 2003 20:18:44 -0400)
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 20:18:44 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> The attached updates the gdb/doc/annotate.texi file (renaming it to
> annotate.texinfo) so that it is a standalone document that:
>
> - notes the limitations of level two annotations
> - points the user at gdb/mi
> - mentions the mi features that have replaced level two annotation
> functionality
I have several comments about this.
Is it really useful to have this as a separate manual? Why not move
the text into an appendix instead? It would simplify the change, for
starters. You didn't show the Makefile.in patch, but it would become
unnecessary. The changes of @section to @chapter would also become
unnecessary. Finally, when we eventually remove level-2 annotations
entirely, you won't need to modify any configury, just delete the
appendix and all references to it.
> +Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> +under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or
> +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
> +Invariant Sections being ``Free Software'' and ``Free Software Needs
> +Free Documentation'', with the Front-Cover Texts being ``A GNU Manual,''
> +and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below.
This text seems to be wrong, since there are no sections named ``Free
Software'' and ``Free Software Needs Free Documentation'' in
annotate.texi. Did I miss something?
> +In a graphical environment, where many values can be displayed
> +simultaneously, a serious performance problem occures when the client
^^^^^^^
This should be "occurs".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-17 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-17 0:19 Andrew Cagney
2003-05-17 8:31 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2003-05-21 20:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-05-24 8:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-07-29 4:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-29 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-07-29 14:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-29 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-07-30 4:13 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8011-Sat17May2003112039+0300-eliz@elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@elta.co.il \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox