From: pedromfc <pedromfc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>,
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
"Ananthakrishna Sowda (asowda)" <asowda@cisco.com>,
"Ivan Baev (ibaev)" <ibaev@cisco.com>,
"'Nemanja Popov'" <nemanja.popov@rt-rk.com>,
Djordje Todorovic <Djordje.Todorovic@rt-rk.com>,
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for prologue processing on PowerPC
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba16b14-9384-34d9-937e-531a2192842a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bf0014c-e83c-5988-4d06-173572f21186@rt-rk.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5120 bytes --]
Hello Nikola, Kevin,
Thank you for providing these patches.
I tested both patches (Nicola's second patch and Kevin's patch) on
ppc64le, and there were no regressions, except for some additional
expected failures in gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp.
Some comments:
- Nikola's patch moves "if(lr_reg == 0)/r0_contains_arg = 0;" to within
the first if. This is useful for the case when a second mflr Rx with Rx
!= 0 is detected. Previously this would cause r0_contains_arg to be
reset, despite Rx not being 0. However, if the second mflr has Rx == 0,
it would make sense to reset r0_contains_arg (and this would work
accidentally before the patch, assuming the first mflr also had Rx ==
0). Maybe the best solution here is to always check the Rx contained in
the opcode and clear r0_contains_arg if it is 0, regardless of lr_reg,
or leave it as before since it's a separate issue.
- Kevin's patch assigns lr_reg = op & 0x03e00000, but lr_reg is an int,
and op is an unsigned long. Will the unshifted reg always fit in a int?
- I think it's more clear to only set lr_register when needed (pc
reaches the limit), as opposed to resetting it to -1 if pc didn't reach
the limit.
- I wasn't able to directly apply Nikola's patch, I did so manually.
I've also attached a reproducer (prologue.c/foo.S) to check if the
patches fixed the issue. I had to alter a generated assembly file so
that mflr would use a register other than R0 (in which case the old code
does work).
gcc -g0 -O0 -o prologue prologue.c foo.S
(gdb) file prologue
Reading symbols from prologue...done.
(gdb) break bar
Breakpoint 1 at 0x100005b8
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/pedromfc/prologue
Before the patch:
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000100005b8 in bar ()
(gdb) bt
#0Â 0x00000000100005b8 in bar ()
#1Â 0x0000000010000644 in foo ()
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC
After (both patches):
Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000100005b8 in bar ()
(gdb) bt
#0Â 0x00000000100005b8 in bar ()
#1Â 0x0000000010000644 in foo ()
#2Â 0x00000000100005f8 in main ()
(gdb) info f 1
Stack frame at 0x7fffffffeee0:
 pc = 0x10000644 in foo; saved pc = 0x100005f8
Thanks!
Pedro
On 11/09/2017 04:15 PM, Nikola Prica wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> lr_reg could be also set to -2 in part of code which is reachable
> after shifting removal.
>
> Â Â Â Â Â /* Invalidate lr_reg, but don't set it to -1.
>         That would mean that it had never been set. */
> Â Â Â Â Â lr_reg = -2;
>
> This part of the code which depends of non shifted lr_reg, and the
> part where shifting is removed are only two places where lr_reg is
> changed. As so, I've added last condition to set fdata->lr_register on
> -1 if lim_pc is not reached.
>
> If it seems fine now could you pleas commit it because I don't have
> rights to do it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nikola Prica
>
>
> From: Prica <nprica@rt-rk.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:10:48 +0100
> Subject: Fix for prologue processing on PowerPC
>
> One of conditions in skip_prologue() is never visited because it
> expects non shifted `lr_reg`. That condition is supposed to set PC
> offset. When body of this condition is visited PC offset is set and
> there will be no need to look for it in next frames nor to use frame
> unwind directives.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> Â Â Â Â *rs6000-tdep.c (skip_prologue): Remove shifting for lr_reg
> Â Â Â Â Â and assign shifted lr_reg to fdata->lr_register when lr_reg is
> Â Â Â Â Â set. If iteration do not hit lim_pc lr_register is set as -1.
> ---
> Â gdb/rs6000-tdep.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> Â 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
> index 6c44995..6f05ef5 100644
> --- a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
> @@ -1655,9 +1655,12 @@ skip_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR lim_pc,
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â remember just the first one, but skip over additional
>          ones. */
> Â Â Â Â Â Â if (lr_reg == -1)
> -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â lr_reg = (op & 0x03e00000) >> 21;
> -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (lr_reg == 0)
> -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â r0_contains_arg = 0;
> +Â Â Â Â Â {
> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â lr_reg = (op & 0x03e00000);
> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â fdata->lr_register = lr_reg >> 21;
> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â if (lr_reg == 0)
> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â r0_contains_arg = 0;
> +Â Â Â Â Â }
> Â Â Â Â Â Â continue;
> Â Â Â Â }
> Â Â Â Â Â Â else if ((op & 0xfc1fffff) == 0x7c000026)
> @@ -2180,8 +2183,8 @@ skip_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
> CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR lim_pc,
> Â Â Â Â }
> Â #endif /* 0 */
>
> -Â if (pc == lim_pc && lr_reg >= 0)
> -Â Â Â fdata->lr_register = lr_reg;
> +Â if (pc != lim_pc)
> +Â Â Â fdata->lr_register = -1;
>
> Â Â fdata->offset = -fdata->offset;
> Â Â return last_prologue_pc;
[-- Attachment #2: prologue.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 74 bytes --]
int bar()
{
return 0;
}
int foo();
int main(void)
{
return foo();
}
[-- Attachment #3: foo.S --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
.file "foo.c"
.abiversion 2
.section ".text"
.align 2
.globl foo
.type foo, @function
foo:
.LCF0:
0: addis 2,12,.TOC.-.LCF0@ha
addi 2,2,.TOC.-.LCF0@l
.localentry foo,.-foo
mflr 3
std 3,16(1)
std 31,-8(1)
stdu 1,-112(1)
mr 31,1
bl bar
nop
mr 9,3
mr 3,9
addi 1,31,112
ld 0,16(1)
mtlr 0
ld 31,-8(1)
blr
.long 0
.byte 0,0,0,1,128,1,0,1
.size foo,.-foo
.ident "GCC: (SUSE Linux) 7.2.1 20170901 [gcc-7-branch revision 251580]"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-22 12:11 Nikola Prica
2017-10-05 2:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2017-10-26 10:02 ` [PING]Fix " Nikola Prica
2017-11-08 16:58 ` Kevin Buettner
2017-11-09 18:15 ` [PING][PATCH] Fix " Nikola Prica
2017-12-01 19:37 ` pedromfc [this message]
2017-12-19 15:57 ` Nikola Prica
2017-12-29 18:05 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-01-09 11:22 ` Nikola Prica
2018-01-10 17:26 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-01-11 15:12 ` Nikola Prica
2018-01-19 7:49 ` Nikola Prica
2018-01-19 19:01 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-01-19 19:08 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-01-27 14:32 ` Nikola Prica
2018-01-31 18:04 ` Pedro Franco de Carvalho
2018-01-31 18:28 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-02-01 13:09 ` Nikola Prica
2018-01-02 10:29 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ba16b14-9384-34d9-937e-531a2192842a@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=pedromfc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Djordje.Todorovic@rt-rk.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=asowda@cisco.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=ibaev@cisco.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=nemanja.popov@rt-rk.com \
--cc=nikola.prica@rt-rk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox