Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase timeout in gdb.mi/list-thread-groups-available.exp
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 13:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77355b99-49d8-e3c2-f2c1-001e5b1ff595@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee9ff58c-1ac5-4728-c11e-ae3d7fa88e35@simark.ca>

On 02-08-19 16:46, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-08-02 9:43 a.m., Tom Tromey wrote:
>> I'm reluctant to make the test suite more sensitive to the environment
>> it's running it.  Is the reason to do this that the test can time out
>> normally, and so we'd like to avoid lengthy timeouts?  If that's the
>> case, can the test be fixed somehow instead?
>>
>> I guess my mental model here is that a timeout should not matter unless
>> a test is flaky.  But maybe that's naive?  I don't know :-)
> 
> No, the test is not expected to time out under normal circumstances.  The advantage
> of having with_read1_timeout_factor is just that if we happen to break this test
> and make it time out, we'll have to wait 10 seconds instead of 100 when running without
> read1.
> 
> Given that the probability of breaking this test is very small, I don't have
> a strong opinion on the matter, it doesn't affect the correctness of the testsuite.

I went ahead and committed a patch introducing with_read1_timeout_factor
( https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-08/msg00107.html ).

Simon, can you commit your patch, fixing both mi_gdb_tests?

Thanks,
- Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-01 14:39 Simon Marchi
2019-08-01 18:18 ` Tom Tromey
2019-08-01 19:16   ` Simon Marchi
     [not found]     ` <cba4616c-4e3c-4217-7c7a-40fb576ea351@suse.de>
2019-08-02 13:43       ` Tom Tromey
2019-08-02 14:46         ` Simon Marchi
2019-08-05 13:58           ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2019-08-05 14:23             ` Simon Marchi
2019-08-05 13:53         ` Tom de Vries
2019-08-15 17:58 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77355b99-49d8-e3c2-f2c1-001e5b1ff595@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox