* [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor lock_file_{acquire,release}
@ 2026-09-25 22:06 Tom de Vries
2026-09-28 16:53 ` Andrew Burgess
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-09-25 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Refactor lock_file_acquire to limit the loop body to the minimum.
Also make error handling more precise by only ignoring EEXIST.
Refactor both lock_file_acquire and lock_file_release to use better variable
names.
Add a test-case checking how the two procs interact.
In order to facilitate more complex testing, factor out a lock_file_acquire
parameter called on_retry, without changing default behavior.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp | 59 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..86a972e807c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Copyright 2026 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+set lockfile [build_standard_output_file "lock.txt"]
+gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Initial"
+
+# Scenario 1:
+# - acquire 1
+# - release 1
+with_test_prefix "simple" {
+ set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock"
+
+ lock_file_release $res
+ gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock"
+}
+
+# Scenario 2:
+# - acquire 1
+# - acquire 2 fails. On retry, release 1. Acquire 2 succeeds.
+# - release 2
+with_test_prefix "on retry unlock" {
+ set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock"
+
+ set on_retry [list lock_file_release $res]
+ # Try to acquire the lock. That should fail.
+ # Then on retry, release the lock.
+ # The next try to acquire the lock should succeed.
+ set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock"
+
+ lock_file_release $res2
+ gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock"
+}
+
+# Scenario 3:
+# - acquire 1
+# - acquire 2 fails, waits, and tries again in a loop.
+# - release 1, acquire 2 succeeds.
+# - release 2
+with_test_prefix "on retry wait" {
+ set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock"
+
+ after 1000 {lock_file_release $res}
+
+ set on_retry {
+ update
+ after 100
+ }
+ set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock"
+
+ lock_file_release $res2
+ gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock"
+}
+
+# Scenario 4:
+# - acquire 1
+# - acquire 2 fails
+with_test_prefix "on retry return" {
+ set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile]
+ gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock"
+
+ set on_retry {
+ return {}
+ }
+ set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry]
+ gdb_assert {$res2 == {}} "Acquire lock again"
+
+ lock_file_release $res
+ gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock"
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp
index 35329f3c46e..aa286b74abc 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp
@@ -178,27 +178,39 @@ proc version_compare { l1 op l2 } {
return 1
}
-# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE. Tries forever until the lock file is
-# successfully created.
-
-proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} {
+# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE.
+# If the lock file doesn't exist, create it and return a file handle/file name
+# pair.
+# If lock file does exist, with default ON_RETRY try again. A custom ON_RETRY
+# may do something different like, for instance, using return.
+# Returns {} on failure.
+
+proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile {on_retry {after 10}}} {
verbose -log "acquiring lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp"
- while {true} {
+
+ while {![info exists fh]} {
try {
- open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL}
- } on ok {rc} {
- set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp"
- verbose -log "lock file: $msg"
- # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns
- # it.
- puts $rc $msg
- flush $rc
- return [list $rc $lockfile]
- } on error {} {
- # Ignore and try again.
+ set fh [open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL}]
+ } trap "POSIX EEXIST" {} {
+ # Lock in use. Ignore and try again. Propagate all other errors.
+ uplevel 1 $on_retry
}
- after 10
}
+
+ # Handle the case that ON_RETRY breaks out of the loop.
+ if {![info exists fh]} {
+ return {}
+ }
+
+ set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp"
+ verbose -log "lock file: $msg"
+
+ # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns
+ # it.
+ puts $fh $msg
+ flush $fh
+
+ return [list $fh $lockfile]
}
# Release a lock file.
@@ -206,17 +218,20 @@ proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} {
proc lock_file_release {info} {
verbose -log "releasing lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp"
+ set fh [lindex $info 0]
+ set lockfile [lindex $info 1]
+
try {
- fconfigure [lindex $info 0]
+ fconfigure $fh
} on error {} {
error "invalid lock"
}
try {
- close [lindex $info 0]
- file delete -force [lindex $info 1]
- } on error {rc} {
- error "Error releasing lockfile: '$rc'"
+ close $fh
+ file delete -force $lockfile
+ } on error {err_msg} {
+ error "Error releasing lockfile: '$err_msg'"
}
return ""
base-commit: aea8b82af17261c88ab4e4b8e623903c49fc81c0
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor lock_file_{acquire,release} 2026-09-25 22:06 [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor lock_file_{acquire,release} Tom de Vries @ 2026-09-28 16:53 ` Andrew Burgess 2026-09-29 11:37 ` Tom de Vries 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andrew Burgess @ 2026-09-28 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries, gdb-patches Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: > Refactor lock_file_acquire to limit the loop body to the minimum. It would be great if commits like this explained a little more about what was being changed and why. Why does it need reducing? > > Also make error handling more precise by only ignoring EEXIST. > > Refactor both lock_file_acquire and lock_file_release to use better variable > names. > > Add a test-case checking how the two procs interact. > > In order to facilitate more complex testing, factor out a lock_file_acquire > parameter called on_retry, without changing default behavior. > --- > gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp | 59 ++++++++++++------- > 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp > > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..86a972e807c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ > +# Copyright 2026 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > + > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or > +# (at your option) any later version. > +# > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > +# > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + > +set lockfile [build_standard_output_file "lock.txt"] > +gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Initial" > + > +# Scenario 1: > +# - acquire 1 > +# - release 1 > +with_test_prefix "simple" { > + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" > + > + lock_file_release $res > + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" > +} > + > +# Scenario 2: > +# - acquire 1 > +# - acquire 2 fails. On retry, release 1. Acquire 2 succeeds. > +# - release 2 > +with_test_prefix "on retry unlock" { > + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" > + > + set on_retry [list lock_file_release $res] > + # Try to acquire the lock. That should fail. > + # Then on retry, release the lock. > + # The next try to acquire the lock should succeed. > + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock" > + > + lock_file_release $res2 > + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" > +} > + > +# Scenario 3: > +# - acquire 1 > +# - acquire 2 fails, waits, and tries again in a loop. > +# - release 1, acquire 2 succeeds. > +# - release 2 > +with_test_prefix "on retry wait" { > + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" > + > + after 1000 {lock_file_release $res} > + > + set on_retry { > + update > + after 100 > + } > + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock" > + > + lock_file_release $res2 > + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" > +} > + > +# Scenario 4: > +# - acquire 1 > +# - acquire 2 fails > +with_test_prefix "on retry return" { > + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] > + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" > + > + set on_retry { > + return {} > + } > + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] > + gdb_assert {$res2 == {}} "Acquire lock again" > + > + lock_file_release $res > + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" > +} > diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp > index 35329f3c46e..aa286b74abc 100644 > --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp > +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp > @@ -178,27 +178,39 @@ proc version_compare { l1 op l2 } { > return 1 > } > > -# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE. Tries forever until the lock file is > -# successfully created. > - > -proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} { > +# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE. > +# If the lock file doesn't exist, create it and return a file handle/file name > +# pair. > +# If lock file does exist, with default ON_RETRY try again. A custom ON_RETRY > +# may do something different like, for instance, using return. > +# Returns {} on failure. It would be nice if there was greater clarity here on the ON_RETRY API. For example, if ON_RETRY uses return then this will return directly to the caller proc, leaving lock_file_acquire, this should be called out I think. > + > +proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile {on_retry {after 10}}} { > verbose -log "acquiring lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" > - while {true} { > + > + while {![info exists fh]} { > try { > - open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL} > - } on ok {rc} { > - set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" > - verbose -log "lock file: $msg" > - # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns > - # it. > - puts $rc $msg > - flush $rc > - return [list $rc $lockfile] > - } on error {} { > - # Ignore and try again. > + set fh [open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL}] > + } trap "POSIX EEXIST" {} { > + # Lock in use. Ignore and try again. Propagate all other errors. > + uplevel 1 $on_retry This use of uplevel seems to make the API much more complex, with us having to handle returns directly from ON_RETRY to the caller proc. Is this complexity really needed? > } > - after 10 > } > + > + # Handle the case that ON_RETRY breaks out of the loop. > + if {![info exists fh]} { > + return {} This code path requires ON_RETRY to use break, but none of the new tests do this, so this path is untested, would be nice if this case was covered too. > + } My AI review tool highlighted this comment as potentially confusing, and I think in this case I agree. Though the comment does mention 'break' it is not clear that this path is only encountered when ON_RETRY uses 'break'. > + > + set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" > + verbose -log "lock file: $msg" > + > + # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns > + # it. > + puts $fh $msg There's an extra space after puts, though I see this was a preexisting mistake. Thanks, Andrew > + flush $fh > + > + return [list $fh $lockfile] > } > > # Release a lock file. > @@ -206,17 +218,20 @@ proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} { > proc lock_file_release {info} { > verbose -log "releasing lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" > > + set fh [lindex $info 0] > + set lockfile [lindex $info 1] > + > try { > - fconfigure [lindex $info 0] > + fconfigure $fh > } on error {} { > error "invalid lock" > } > > try { > - close [lindex $info 0] > - file delete -force [lindex $info 1] > - } on error {rc} { > - error "Error releasing lockfile: '$rc'" > + close $fh > + file delete -force $lockfile > + } on error {err_msg} { > + error "Error releasing lockfile: '$err_msg'" > } > > return "" > > base-commit: aea8b82af17261c88ab4e4b8e623903c49fc81c0 > -- > 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor lock_file_{acquire,release} 2026-09-28 16:53 ` Andrew Burgess @ 2026-09-29 11:37 ` Tom de Vries 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-09-29 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Burgess, gdb-patches On 9/28/26 6:53 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: > >> Refactor lock_file_acquire to limit the loop body to the minimum. > > It would be great if commits like this explained a little more about > what was being changed and why. Why does it need reducing? > Hi Andrew, thanks for the review. I think the comment is somewhat terse as a consequence of the fact that I didn't take the time to factor this patch out into a series. I've done so now in a v2 with 6 patches (forgot to include cover letter in submission, so): - cover letter: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-September/230720.html - first patch: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-September/230716.html I've tried to explain in a bit more detail in the patch dedicated to this specific change. >> Also make error handling more precise by only ignoring EEXIST. >> >> Refactor both lock_file_acquire and lock_file_release to use better variable >> names. >> >> Add a test-case checking how the two procs interact. >> >> In order to facilitate more complex testing, factor out a lock_file_acquire >> parameter called on_retry, without changing default behavior. >> --- >> gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp | 59 ++++++++++++------- >> 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp >> >> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000000..86a972e807c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.testsuite/lock.exp >> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ >> +# Copyright 2026 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> + >> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or >> +# (at your option) any later version. >> +# >> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> +# GNU General Public License for more details. >> +# >> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> +# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >> + >> +set lockfile [build_standard_output_file "lock.txt"] >> +gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Initial" >> + >> +# Scenario 1: >> +# - acquire 1 >> +# - release 1 >> +with_test_prefix "simple" { >> + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" >> + >> + lock_file_release $res >> + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" >> +} >> + >> +# Scenario 2: >> +# - acquire 1 >> +# - acquire 2 fails. On retry, release 1. Acquire 2 succeeds. >> +# - release 2 >> +with_test_prefix "on retry unlock" { >> + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" >> + >> + set on_retry [list lock_file_release $res] >> + # Try to acquire the lock. That should fail. >> + # Then on retry, release the lock. >> + # The next try to acquire the lock should succeed. >> + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock" >> + >> + lock_file_release $res2 >> + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" >> +} >> + >> +# Scenario 3: >> +# - acquire 1 >> +# - acquire 2 fails, waits, and tries again in a loop. >> +# - release 1, acquire 2 succeeds. >> +# - release 2 >> +with_test_prefix "on retry wait" { >> + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" >> + >> + after 1000 {lock_file_release $res} >> + >> + set on_retry { >> + update >> + after 100 >> + } >> + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Re-acquire lock" >> + >> + lock_file_release $res2 >> + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" >> +} >> + >> +# Scenario 4: >> +# - acquire 1 >> +# - acquire 2 fails >> +with_test_prefix "on retry return" { >> + set res [lock_file_acquire $lockfile] >> + gdb_assert {[file exists $lockfile]} "Acquire lock" >> + >> + set on_retry { >> + return {} >> + } >> + set res2 [lock_file_acquire $lockfile $on_retry] >> + gdb_assert {$res2 == {}} "Acquire lock again" >> + >> + lock_file_release $res >> + gdb_assert {![file exists $lockfile]} "Release lock" >> +} >> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp >> index 35329f3c46e..aa286b74abc 100644 >> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp >> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb-utils.exp >> @@ -178,27 +178,39 @@ proc version_compare { l1 op l2 } { >> return 1 >> } >> >> -# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE. Tries forever until the lock file is >> -# successfully created. >> - >> -proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} { >> +# Acquire lock file LOCKFILE. >> +# If the lock file doesn't exist, create it and return a file handle/file name >> +# pair. >> +# If lock file does exist, with default ON_RETRY try again. A custom ON_RETRY >> +# may do something different like, for instance, using return. >> +# Returns {} on failure. > > It would be nice if there was greater clarity here on the ON_RETRY API. > For example, if ON_RETRY uses return then this will return directly to > the caller proc, leaving lock_file_acquire, this should be called out I > think. > I've now made on_retry a proc, which is easier to describe. >> + >> +proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile {on_retry {after 10}}} { >> verbose -log "acquiring lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" >> - while {true} { >> + >> + while {![info exists fh]} { >> try { >> - open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL} >> - } on ok {rc} { >> - set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" >> - verbose -log "lock file: $msg" >> - # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns >> - # it. >> - puts $rc $msg >> - flush $rc >> - return [list $rc $lockfile] >> - } on error {} { >> - # Ignore and try again. >> + set fh [open $lockfile {WRONLY CREAT EXCL}] >> + } trap "POSIX EEXIST" {} { >> + # Lock in use. Ignore and try again. Propagate all other errors. >> + uplevel 1 $on_retry > > This use of uplevel seems to make the API much more complex, with us > having to handle returns directly from ON_RETRY to the caller proc. Is > this complexity really needed? > I chose uplevel because it allowed me to specify the default behavior as a default value. But agreed, it is complex. I've now made on_retry a proc with default value "", so we have the much simpler: ... + if {$on_retry == ""} { + after 10 + } elseif {![$on_retry]} { + return {} + } ... Thanks for this question, I hope this version is easier to reason about. FWIW, we could even simplify this to something like: ... + if {$on_retry == ""} { + after 10 + } else { + $on_retry + } ... but I think that having on_retry return a value deciding whether to continue retrying or not makes sense from an API perspective. >> } >> - after 10 >> } >> + >> + # Handle the case that ON_RETRY breaks out of the loop. >> + if {![info exists fh]} { >> + return {} > > This code path requires ON_RETRY to use break, but none of the new tests > do this, so this path is untested, would be nice if this case was > covered too. > Ouch, nice catch. Anyway, with the new on_retry as proc approach, this bit is dropped. >> + } > > My AI review tool highlighted this comment as potentially confusing, and > I think in this case I agree. Though the comment does mention 'break' > it is not clear that this path is only encountered when ON_RETRY uses > 'break'. > >> + >> + set msg "locked by $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" >> + verbose -log "lock file: $msg" >> + >> + # For debugging, put info in the lockfile about who owns >> + # it. >> + puts $fh $msg > > There's an extra space after puts, though I see this was a preexisting > mistake. > I've fixed this in the first patch that touches that line. Thanks, - Tom > > Thanks, > Andrew > >> + flush $fh >> + >> + return [list $fh $lockfile] >> } >> >> # Release a lock file. >> @@ -206,17 +218,20 @@ proc lock_file_acquire {lockfile} { >> proc lock_file_release {info} { >> verbose -log "releasing lock file: $::subdir/${::gdb_test_file_name}.exp" >> >> + set fh [lindex $info 0] >> + set lockfile [lindex $info 1] >> + >> try { >> - fconfigure [lindex $info 0] >> + fconfigure $fh >> } on error {} { >> error "invalid lock" >> } >> >> try { >> - close [lindex $info 0] >> - file delete -force [lindex $info 1] >> - } on error {rc} { >> - error "Error releasing lockfile: '$rc'" >> + close $fh >> + file delete -force $lockfile >> + } on error {err_msg} { >> + error "Error releasing lockfile: '$err_msg'" >> } >> >> return "" >> >> base-commit: aea8b82af17261c88ab4e4b8e623903c49fc81c0 >> -- >> 2.51.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-29 11:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-25 22:06 [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Refactor lock_file_{acquire,release} Tom de Vries
2026-09-28 16:53 ` Andrew Burgess
2026-09-29 11:37 ` Tom de Vries
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox