Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
	       Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	       Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
	binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72237b44-c785-c22d-5664-a87c28a9678a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <867f4uccky.fsf@gmail.com>

On 02/13/2017 03:52 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> These options should be modeled as per-architecture data.  We need to
> define a key to access that data dynamically.  grep
> "static struct gdbarch_data *" in *.c.

If I understand the suggestion correctly, that would make all the different
POWER (etc.) gdbarch instances have their own instance of the option string.
I.e., the POWER gdbarch instance determined for the objfile before the program
is run or GDB connects to a target would have a different set of options than
the gdbarch instance created based on the POWER-based XML target description
returned by the (e.g.), remote server, because those are different
gdbarch object instances.  As a result "set disassembler-options" would
show different options before and after run/connection (and in other
situations that use different gdbarch objects).

What Alan's implementation achieves instead is that there's only one option
value string for the whole family of gdbarchs of a given architecture, like
POWER vs MIPS, vs x86, etc, so that the disassembler options active persist
across internal uses of all the different gdbarch instances that
model variants of the same CPU architecture.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08 21:03 Peter Bergner
2017-02-13 15:53 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-13 16:31   ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-13 16:58   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-02-13 17:32     ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-14 17:21     ` Yao Qi
2017-02-14 17:35       ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-13 17:08   ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-13 18:48   ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-14 20:01     ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-15 23:14       ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-15 23:48         ` Alan Modra
2017-02-16  0:21         ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-16  1:59           ` Peter Bergner
2017-02-16  2:09             ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-13 18:52 ` Peter Bergner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72237b44-c785-c22d-5664-a87c28a9678a@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=amodra@gmail.com \
    --cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox