From: Ronald Hecht <ronald.hecht@gmx.de>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: z80: Fix endless loop in frame unwinder and validate saved register types
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 09:16:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70fda660-e612-4fde-b1f9-0849f1b86191@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260620130931.4004215f@f44-mesa-1>
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for the review and the approval! Since I do not have write
access to the GDB repository, could you please push the patch on my behalf?
Best regards,
Ronald
On 6/20/26 22:11, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> This looks great! Thanks for making the changes I requested.
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:04:01 +0200
> Ronald Hecht <ronald.hecht@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> In z80_frame_unwind_cache, the loop scanning for the frame base pointer
>> (for (;; ++sp)) could run into an endless loop or scan too far if the
>> termination condition (sp < this_base) was not met due to corrupted
>> or unexpected stack layouts. This patch introduces a loop_count to
>> limit the scan to a maximum of 2 * addr_len iterations.
>>
>> Additionally, when iterating through saved registers to adjust their
>> offsets into concrete addresses, the code now explicitly checks if
>> the register actually holds an address using is_addr() before calling
>> addr(). This prevents potential assertions or undefined behavior for
>> registers that do not contain valid address data.
>>
>> gdb/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * z80-tdep.c (z80_frame_unwind_cache): Limit stack scanning
>> to 2 * addr_len iterations to prevent endless loops. Check
>> is_addr() before adjusting saved register addresses.
> The ChangeLog entry isn't required, but there's no harm in having it in
> the commit log. Regardless, don't add it to any ChangeLog files prior
> to pushing it.
>
> Approved-By: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 18:56 [PATCH] gdb: z80: Fix endless backtrace loop and assertion crashes Ronald Hecht
2026-06-06 19:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2026-06-07 7:36 ` Ronald Hecht
2026-06-07 7:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Ronald Hecht
2026-06-14 22:06 ` Kevin Buettner
2026-06-15 6:49 ` Ronald Hecht
2026-06-15 7:04 ` [PATCH v3] gdb: z80: Fix endless loop in frame unwinder and validate saved register types Ronald Hecht
2026-06-20 20:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2026-06-23 7:16 ` Ronald Hecht [this message]
2026-07-09 3:52 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70fda660-e612-4fde-b1f9-0849f1b86191@gmx.de \
--to=ronald.hecht@gmx.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox