From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Gerrit emails
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org>
On 2019-10-17 10:44 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:22:04 -0400
>>
>> Ok, so the addresses are duplicated between the "To:" and the "Reply-to:" fields.
>
> I think the fact that some of them appear in CC might also matter.
> Also note that cbiesinger@google.com appears twice in Reply-To.
Right, those in CC are also in Reply-to. But there's not overlap between To and CC.
>> I am not sure what a client is expected to do in that case. There seems to be some
>> divergence between clients, for example Thunderbird doesn't duplicate the addresses
>> when I hit "Reply all". Perhaps Rmail can be modified to not put an address in CC
>> if it sees it's already in the To field?
>
> The logic in Rmail for how to generate the To: and CC: headers is
> complex and tries to support quite a few use cases. It never gave me
> any trouble, in all the years that I'm using it. Changing it for this
> single server would be unwise, IMO, because it will most probably
> break much more important use cases.
Agreed.
>> I did not find any setting in Gerrit to omit the "Reply-to" field of the sent messages,
>> so I fear it won't be possible to change it in the immediate. I can try to look
>> at modifying Gerrit from source, but that will take a bit of time.
>
> That's just too bad. Thanks for trying.
>
> Are you sure the Reply-To comes from Gerrit and not from the list
> server?
I am 95% sure that Gerrit adds it. When I looked at other messages on the list (such as
this one), they don't have Reply-to.
Also, I receive some messages in double, when I am in the To: field and because I am
also registered to the gdb-patches list. If I compare two identical messages I received,
they both have the same Reply-to header. So it would mean that it's Gerrit that adds it,
since the version I receive directly from Gerrit has the header.
I don't think that Reply-to header is so important for us. On the list, I presume everybody
just does "Reply all".
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 7:12 Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca>
2019-10-17 14:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 14:55 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2019-10-17 16:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 14:52 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-17 14:57 ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-17 16:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 18:14 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-17 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox