Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Gerrit emails
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org>

On 2019-10-17 10:44 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:22:04 -0400
>>
>> Ok, so the addresses are duplicated between the "To:" and the "Reply-to:" fields.
> 
> I think the fact that some of them appear in CC might also matter.
> Also note that cbiesinger@google.com appears twice in Reply-To.

Right, those in CC are also in Reply-to.  But there's not overlap between To and CC.

>> I am not sure what a client is expected to do in that case.  There seems to be some
>> divergence between clients, for example Thunderbird doesn't duplicate the addresses
>> when I hit "Reply all".  Perhaps Rmail can be modified to not put an address in CC
>> if it sees it's already in the To field?
> 
> The logic in Rmail for how to generate the To: and CC: headers is
> complex and tries to support quite a few use cases.  It never gave me
> any trouble, in all the years that I'm using it.  Changing it for this
> single server would be unwise, IMO, because it will most probably
> break much more important use cases.

Agreed.

>> I did not find any setting in Gerrit to omit the "Reply-to" field of the sent messages,
>> so I fear it won't be possible to change it in the immediate.  I can try to look
>> at modifying Gerrit from source, but that will take a bit of time.
> 
> That's just too bad.  Thanks for trying.
> 
> Are you sure the Reply-To comes from Gerrit and not from the list
> server?

I am 95% sure that Gerrit adds it.  When I looked at other messages on the list (such as
this one), they don't have Reply-to.

Also, I receive some messages in double, when I am in the To: field and because I am
also registered to the gdb-patches list.  If I compare two identical messages I received,
they both have the same Reply-to header.  So it would mean that it's Gerrit that adds it,
since the version I receive directly from Gerrit has the header.

I don't think that Reply-to header is so important for us.  On the list, I presume everybody
just does "Reply all".

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-17 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-17  7:12 Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] ` <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca>
2019-10-17 14:45   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 14:55     ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2019-10-17 16:26       ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 14:52   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-17 14:57     ` Simon Marchi
2019-10-17 16:24     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-10-17 18:14       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-10-17 18:29         ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox