From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10108 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2019 14:55:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10095 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2019 14:55:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=everybody, emails X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:55:04 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECED11E508; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:55:02 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Gerrit emails To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <83eezbdewk.fsf@gnu.org> <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca> <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <6fb1bd2b-e9cf-efee-8c24-71c0ff0d1363@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:55:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 On 2019-10-17 10:44 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Simon Marchi >> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:22:04 -0400 >> >> Ok, so the addresses are duplicated between the "To:" and the "Reply-to:" fields. > > I think the fact that some of them appear in CC might also matter. > Also note that cbiesinger@google.com appears twice in Reply-To. Right, those in CC are also in Reply-to. But there's not overlap between To and CC. >> I am not sure what a client is expected to do in that case. There seems to be some >> divergence between clients, for example Thunderbird doesn't duplicate the addresses >> when I hit "Reply all". Perhaps Rmail can be modified to not put an address in CC >> if it sees it's already in the To field? > > The logic in Rmail for how to generate the To: and CC: headers is > complex and tries to support quite a few use cases. It never gave me > any trouble, in all the years that I'm using it. Changing it for this > single server would be unwise, IMO, because it will most probably > break much more important use cases. Agreed. >> I did not find any setting in Gerrit to omit the "Reply-to" field of the sent messages, >> so I fear it won't be possible to change it in the immediate. I can try to look >> at modifying Gerrit from source, but that will take a bit of time. > > That's just too bad. Thanks for trying. > > Are you sure the Reply-To comes from Gerrit and not from the list > server? I am 95% sure that Gerrit adds it. When I looked at other messages on the list (such as this one), they don't have Reply-to. Also, I receive some messages in double, when I am in the To: field and because I am also registered to the gdb-patches list. If I compare two identical messages I received, they both have the same Reply-to header. So it would mean that it's Gerrit that adds it, since the version I receive directly from Gerrit has the header. I don't think that Reply-to header is so important for us. On the list, I presume everybody just does "Reply all". Simon